|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sony Point and Shoot and Non-DSLR
Home > Digital Camera Reviews > Sony Digital Cameras > Sony Point and Shoot and Non-DSLR
Advertisement
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W35 Digital Camera Reviewby James MurrayPublished on April 26, 2007
Imatest also provides a chart that better shows the error between specific colors. The original colors of the chart are represented by squares, and the W35’s colors are depicted as circles. The line connecting the two theoretically shouldn’t be there, but shows the color error. If the circles are positioned closer to the edges of the chart than the center, they are oversaturated. If closer to the center, they are undersaturated.
Most of the camera's colors are tightly tethered to where they should be, so the Sony W35 performed quite well. The red and purple colors are the most inaccurate, but most digital cameras exaggerate those colors to enhance "flesh tones." The colors are only slightly oversaturated at 102.2 percent. The mean color error is 6.67, which gives this model a 9.00 overall color score. This mark approaches fabulous image quality as its colors are generally very accurate; this is much better than its W-series predecessors’ performances.
This Sony digital camera has a 7.2-megapixel Super HAD CCD image sensor. To test its resolution, we shot an industry standard resolution chart at different focal lengths and apertures to ensure the sharpest shot possible.
Using data collected from Imatest imaging software, we sorted through our many photos and selected the sharpest image, which was taken at a19mm focal length, with an aperture of f 5.2, and ISO 100. The image above shows significant barrel distortion. The program judges resolution in terms of line widths per picture height (lw/ph), which is a theoretical measurement of how many alternating black and white lines of equal thickness could fit across the frame. This shows us how much detail the Sony W35 can capture. Noise – Manual ISO (6.43)
The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W35 shows a reasonably steady curve of noise that moves upward as the ISO increases. This curve looks very similar to the W30’s performance, although it starts and ends with slightly less noise throughout the range. Still, the curve with the plateau between ISO 400 and 800 is reminiscent of the W30. The shots for this test were taken in optimal lighting though. To see how well the camera handles noise when the lights turn low, check out the next section.
The Sony W35 had trouble keeping the subject illuminated, mostly because it didn’t open the shutter very long. As the lights dimmed, the colors were increasingly inaccurate. The mean color error at a 0.4-second exposure was a fairly normal 6.68. That nearly doubled to 12.6 when a 1.2-second shutter speed was used in low light, and to 22.3 mean color error at two seconds. Colors weren’t the only aspect of the picture to suffer in low light either. Noise was apparent in all of the pictures. Below is a chart showing the exposure time on the horizontal axis and the amount of noise on the vertical axis.
The noise level remains fairly steady, although there isn’t much variation in the exposure time on this digital camera. We used the ISO 400 setting for this test, and there is more noise than expected. Most point-and-shooters who are photographing in light this low will probably hike the ISO up as high as it can go: ISO 1000. This will produce very noisy images though. The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W35 came out with a low light score of 5.5, which is better than its predecessor but that’s not saying much.
This Cyber-shot has fairly decent dynamic range throughout all of its ISO settings. The test photos produced about seven exposure values at the lowest ISO setting, and when set to ISO 200 there was a sharp decline to six values. There was another significant drop in range between ISO 400 and 800 but that is to be expected on point-and-shoot cameras that have relatively small image sensors and thus, small pixels. Users should remember that this test stretches the ability of the camera to its best. Everyday photos probably won’t garner seven exposure values - this test is meant to compare cameras.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© Copyright 2009 DigitalCameraInfo.com, all rights reserved. All trademarks and product names are property of their respective owners. DigitalCameraInfo.com makes no guarantees regarding any of the advice offered on this web site or by its staff or users. All user comments and postings are not the responsibility of DigitalCameraInfo.com. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||