| Recently Viewed Products | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Top Point & Shoot Cameras | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $1020
Filters
|
|
|
| TL34HD Prices |
|---|
| Latest Camera Reviews | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| External Reviews |
|---|
Steve's Digicams Samsung TL34HD Digital Trends Samsung TL34HD |

The TL34 captured purples and greens well

This information can also be expressed in the chart below. In this version, the ideal color is represented by the square, the captured color is the circle, and the hue and saturation difference is expressed by the direction and length of the line between them, with a short line representing a close value. The TL34HD slightly under-saturated the image, but captured greens, purples, flesh tones and some dark blues very well.

Flesh tones (numbered 1 and 2) are quite accurately captured

Resolution (10.10)
While the Samsung does boast an impressive 14.7-megapixel image size, resolution is more than just pixel count. We test resolution to assess the sharpness of the final image, which is affected by sensor, processing, optics and other factors. Once again, we rely on an industry standard chart and Imatest to analyze these results. The resolution is calculated as line widths per pixel height (lw/ph), which is a measure of the number of alternating black and white lines over a known area.

A full sized section of our resolution chart as shot by the TL34HD
The TL34HD grabbed 2162 lw/ph horizontally, and 2127 lw/ph vertically, with some slight under-sharpening. This is a good score, one which indicates that the Samsung will be able to capture a large amount of information in each photo. While it didn't do quite as well as the NV40 or Fujifilm F60fd, it handily outperformed both the Sony and Canon that we're comparing it to.


It's normal to see a gradual decrease in dynamic range as ISOs increase, but the TL34HD behaved oddly, in that it started with a very high score at ISO 80, dropped dramatically at ISO 100, and then leveled out. With these results, the implication is that if you're shooting at the low end of the ISO scale, you'll get fantastic dynamic range, but there's no major performance drop between ISO 400 and ISO 1600.

The camera scored astonishingly well in this section because of its performance under flash and fluorescent illumination. In both cases, the TL34HD compensated admirably for the light, which bumped up its overall score. In indirect sunlight and tungsten light, the camera scored less well, especially struggling in the latter. However, the sunlight score was on par with most other cameras, and shows that this model has a very competent method of judging lighting, except perhaps under incandescent bulbs.
|
Exaggerated White Balance Errors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() Auto WB - Tungsten illumination |
Preset (5.82)
Unfortunately, the TL34HD didn't fare quite as well using presets, and didn't offer one for flash illumination. Under every light source except tungsten, the TL34HD did better just being left on auto. Even with the tungsten lights, the results were barely average when compared to other cameras. This is clearly a camera that can be just left to its own devices under different lighting conditions.
|
Exaggerated White Balance Errors (Presets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Samsung's exemplary performance while left on automatic puts the TL34HD considerably beyond the competition for white balance.

Page 3 of 15
Noise and Video