Pentax Optio W60 Digital Camera Review

Pentax Optio W60

Digital Camera Review

2 The Pentax Optio W60 is meant to be your foul-weather photographic friend, oblivious to water (whether a splash or a full-on immersion) and freezing cold. You wouldn't know it at a glance, though - the 10-megapixel W60 is as sleekly styled and pocketable as any non-ruggedized compact camera. You do pay a premium price for weatherproofing, though, at $329.95. After running the camera through our complete suite of lab and field testing, we like the W60 for snowboarders and poolside pleasures, but the lack of manual controls and slow shooting performance are concerns. The full review follows.
Advertisement
Recently Viewed Products
$170
$299
$210
$298
Top Point & Shoot Cameras
Max Price: $1020
$0 $255 $510 $765 $1020
Filters
All
Canon
Casio
Fuji
Kodak
Nikon
Olympus
Panasonic
Pentax
Sony
All
Compact
High-End
Pocket
Ultra-Zoom
1.Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1
Ultra-Zoom
$400
2.Canon SX1 IS
Ultra-Zoom
$527
3.Panasonic DMC-ZS3
Compact
$318
4.Samsung HZ15W
Ultra-Zoom
$280
5.Canon G11
High-End
$499
Optio W60 Prices
Latest Camera Reviews
DSLR Point & Shoot
Panasonic
DMC-GF1
Canon
G11
Pentax
K10D
Panasonic
DMC-ZS3
Olympus
E-P1
Canon
PowerShot A650 IS
Canon
EOS 5D
Kodak
EasyShare Z950
Nikon
D3000
Nikon
Coolpix S630
External Reviews
Trusted Reviews
Pentax Optio W60
Imaging Resource
Pentax Optio W60
DigitalCameraReview.com
Pentax Optio W60
Steve's Digicams
Pentax Optio W60

Our lab testing of the W60 was a decidedly mixed bag. Low light performance wasn’t great, and our timing results were a problem for a camera destined for active lifestyle grab-shots. The camera turned in very good resolution scores, though, and the manual noise results were also impressive. As for the noise results when shooting in auto ISO mode, the W60 earned a digital dunce cap on that particular test.

Color (7.62)

There’s a reason that color performance is presented first among our battery of in-depth tests: when it comes to measuring technical camera performance, this is the one area that triggers a powerful emotional response. The impact of a brilliant blue sky, the warm reds and oranges of a fireplace, the blonde curls of a child all pop out for us as soon as we look at an image, long before you notice peculiarities in resolution or dynamic range. And while image editing software is frequently used to enhance color for dramatic effect, what we’re testing for here is accuracy. Mess with the reality of a photo for artistic reasons to your heart’s content, but we want to start out with a photo that faithfully captures the scene we saw.
Our color testing procedure calls for shooting a standard Gretag Macbeth color chart under controlled lighting conditions, at a variety of exposure settings. The resulting images are processed through Imatest image analysis software, which identifies off hues far more accurately than the human eye. For each color square in the Imatest chart below, the outer rectangle represents the color captured by the W60, the inner square is the captured color corrected for luminance, and the inset rectangle is the original chart color.




A second Imatest chart makes it easy to see the degree to which color reproduction accuracy suffers. In this chart, the ideal color is shown within the squares, the captured colors appear in the circles, and the length of the lines linking them indicates how the camera fared: shorter lines mean greater color accuracy.


In this representation of color performance,
shorter lines indicate greater accuracy.

The W60 produced adequate, but not exemplary, results. The greens are pretty much spot on, and the reds are also very close, helping to turn out good-looking landscapes and portraits. The blues are drifting noticeably off the mark, interesting for a camera designed for underwater use, though unless you’re shooting blue-faced folks, accuracy in this area is likely to be less noticeable in the final photo.

Pentax W60 Color Scores

When compared to four other cameras we’ve tested recently, the W60 is a significant notch below some of the dry-land competition, but substantially outperforms the Olympus Stylus 1030SW, it’s waterproof rival.

Resolution (8.16)
The number of megapixels a camera’s image sensor boasts doesn’t relate directly to the ability to create tack-sharp photos. Many camera systems, including optics, digital signal processing and image compression, combine to determine the final image quality. That’s why we shoot an industry-standard resolution chart with each camera, use Imatest to determine how precisely the actual photo produced by the camera captures the fine lines on the chart (scored as line widths per pixel  height, or lw/ph), and from that data produce a score which lets us compare performance across camera brands, models and specs.


A close-up of the industry-standard resolution chart we use for testing

The Pentax did well in our resolution testing, with a maximum performance of 1780 lw/ph with minimal oversharpening. This result was achieved at the lens’ widest zoom setting. Moving the camera back and shooting at higher telephoto magnification did cut resolution performance noticeably. While even at maximum zoom the resolution performance is acceptable, the camera clearly favors wide-angle, scenic shooting.

Pentax W60 Resolution Scores


The W60 stands up well to the competition, roughly equal to the Nikon and Olympus, handily outperforming the inexpensive Panasonic Lumix, and significantly behind only the surprisingly strong Samsung resolution stat.
 
Dynamic Range (5.29)
Cameras can’t capture as broad a range of light as the human eye can see, but the closer they come, the happier we are. A wide dynamic range means you keep all that delicious detail in the shadowy areas of a photo, and the bright spots hold onto some tone and texture instead of simply appearing as bright white blobs.

Our dynamic range test requires shooting a backlit Stouffer chart, which consists of patches spanning from pure white to pitch black. The test photos are chewed on a bit by Imatest, which spits out a reading of how wide a range was successfully reproduced. Ordinarily higher ISO settings, with the higher image noise level that comes with them, cuts down on dynamic range performance. That’s why we shoot at the full range of available ISOs, and graph the results like this:

The dynamic range starts out nicely at the lowest ISO, but drops off too quickly through ISO 400, at which point it effectively levels off. The strong performance at ISO 50 may help the camera’s score a bit, but once you get to ISO 400, a very moderate setting if you’re trying to stop fast action, you’re going to run into noticeable lighting problems in less-than-perfect situations.

In our camera comparison, the W60 and the Nikon Coolpix lag significantly behind the others, including the waterproof Olympus.

White Balance (7.89)
Inexpensive cameras have a tough time with this one – for that matter, quite a few pricey SLRs stumble when it comes to white balance testing as well. The challenge is adjusting to the different colors of light produced by varied sources of illumination. Sunshine, for example, isn’t white – it’s warm and reddish, where fluorescent light has a green tint. When we look at a white piece of paper under these very different sources of illumination, tough, our brains compensate. Cameras try to compensate, too, with three features. The easiest to use is choosing the Automatic setting, where the camera meters the light and adjust white balance accordingly. The second is selecting from a set of presets, built into the camera, which are  tailored to specific lighting conditions. Finally you can take a manual white balance reading by shooting a neutral white or gray surface under current lighting conditions.

We test the first two, shooting a color chart under varied light sources, including flash, fluorescent, shaded daylight and tungsten (incandescent), using both the automatic white balance capability and the white balance presets.

Auto White Balance (6.86)
The automatic white balance system didn’t cope well at all with tungsten illumination, the kind you’d find in a household with standard incandescent bulbs – this is always a problem area, but the W60 was particularly far off, and fluorescent light was another major problem. On the plus side, flash and shaded daylight photos were quite accurate in auto mode. In the following graphic representation of Imatest results, the difference between the original and the captured colors are exaggerated – you wouldn’t see this great a difference in your actual photos.

   Exaggerated White Balance Errors


Auto WB - Flash Illumination
 

  
Auto WB - Fluorescent Illumination
 


Auto WB - Daylight illumination

 
Auto WB - Tungsten illumination
 

Preset (8.91)
Using the fluorescent and tungsten presets produced tremendous improvements in white balance accuracy. This is not always the case – just because a camera offers white balance presets doesn’t mean they’ll actually help performance under test conditions. In many cases, we’ve found presets that worked less well than the automatic system. Happily, the few seconds spent by the user invoking the W60 presets is time well spent. One minor caveat: the W60 doesn’t include a flash preset, found on most cameras, but the flash results in auto mode were fine in the first place.
 

   Exaggerated White Balance Errors (Presets)


Florescent Preset WB - Fluorescent Illumination 


  Cloudy Daylight preset WB - Daylight illumination


Tungsten preset WB - Tungsten illumination

Averaging the automatic and preset scores produces a decent white balance score for the W60. Keep in mind, though, that a quick settings adjustment to the fluorescent and tungsten presets will deliver notably superior results.

Pentax W60 White Balance Scores

Advertisement