| Recently Viewed Products | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Top DSLR Cameras | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $7200
Filters
|
|
|
| DMC-GH1 Prices |
|---|
| External Reviews |
|---|
New York Times - Tech General An S.L.R. Tailored for VideoPhotography Bay Panasonic DMC-GH1 ReviewLets Go Digital Panasonic DMC-GH1 ReviewePhotoZine Panasonic DMC-GH1CNET - Cameras Panasonic DMC-GH1 |
| Olympus E-30 Comparison Summary | ||||
The Olympus E-30 is priced at nearly $1300 without a lens or a video recording function. It offers an articulated screen and some advanced features, including two control dials to speed manual exposure settings and extensive customization options. We also like some of the fun features for shooting and in-camera image editing. Both cameras have issues with image noise (they have the same size sensor). Superior resolution, color accuracy and burst rate results give the Olympus some crediblity, but overall the Panasonic, with its exceptional Live View performance and first-rate video, is a better buy. |
||||
|
Nikon D90 Comparison | Page 19 of 21 | Conclusion | |
| Comparison Specifications | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Panasonic GH1 | Olympus E-30 | |
| Price | $1499.95 with 14-140mm OIS lens | $1299.99 (body only) |
| Dimensions | 4.88 x 3.29 x 1.78in/124 x 90 x 45mm 13.6 oz/385g |
5.6 in/141.5 mm (W) x 4.23 in/107.5mm (H) x 2.95 in/75 mm (D), 23.1 oz/655gg |
| Resolution | 12.1 megapixels | 12.3 megapixels |
| Processor | Venus Engine HD | TruePic III+ Image Processor |
| Sensor size/type | 17.3mm x 13.0mm Live MOS sensor | 17.3mm x 13.0mm Live MOS |
| Kit Lens | 14-140mm OIS | no |
| Viewfinder | Live View electronic viewfinder | 98% field of view, 1.02x magnification |
| LCD | 460,000-dot, 3.0 inch articulated screen | 230,000 pixel, 2.7 inch articulated LCD |
| Live View | Contrast Autofocus, 23-area, 1-area,tracking, face detection; manual focus | Manual focus Autofocus: High speed imager AF, Phase-difference detection AF |
| Shutter Speed | 1/4000 sec to 60 sec, bulb | 60 - 1/8000 sec, bulb up to 30 minutes |
| Burst Speed | Max 3 shots/sec | 1-5 frames per second |
| Autofocus | Contrast AF | TTL phase-difference detection system, 11 points |
| Exposure Compensation |
±3 EV in 1/3 stop increments | ±5 EV in 1/3, 1/2, 1 EV steps |
| Noise Reduction | High ISO (5 levels), Long Exposure | High ISO (three levels), Long Exposure |
| ISO range | 100-3200 in 1/3 or 1 EV increments | ISO 100-3200 in 1/3 or 1 EV |
| Flash | Built-in, pop-up | Retractable flash, GN=18 @ISO200, (GN=13 @ISO 100.m) |
| Media Format | Still: JPEG, RAW Video: AVCHD and Motion JPEG |
JPEG, RAW |
| Movie Mode | Yes, maximum resolution 1080p @24fps | No |
| Media Type | SD/SDHC | CF (UDMA compatible), xD |
| Connections | USB, NTSC, HDMI | Proprietary USB DC in |
| Other Hardware | DC power cable | No |
| Comparison Scores | ||
| Panasonic GH1 | Olympus E-30 | |
| Color | 10.78 | 13.56 |
| Long Exposure | 5.35 | 7.93 |
| White Balance | 8.39 | 9.61 |
| Noise | 5.60 | 5.54 |
| Resolution | 9.02 | 13.03 |
| Shot to Shot | 3.16 | 4.63 |
| Dynamic Range | 7.76 | 5.49 |
Performance
Both cameras have image noise challenges, with the Panasonic GH1 receiving a marginally better score in this area. For the most part, though, the Olympus delivered superior still image performance results, notably in color accuracy, long exposure and resolution. The difference in shot to shot speed is also significant, pointing to the higher-performance target market for the E-30. When we tested the E-30, we were impressed with its autofocus speed in Live View mode, and it still stands out from the Nikon and Canon experience. Compared to the GH1, though, it's a slow-poke in Live View mode.
Components
The E-30 is one solidly built camera, built to take abuse in the field, with advanced features including dual control dials for quick manual exposure setting and a monochrome LCD on top. The grip on the E-30 is also larger and more comfortable. While both cameras offer articulated screens, the GH1 version is superior, with a larger size (at 3 inches versus 2.7 inches) and a higher resolution (460,000 dots versus 230,000). The GH1 also provides an HDMI output and, while it's not unusual for a camera without video capability to skip HDMI, it's very useful for seeing your still images on an HTV screen in all their high-def glory too.
Handling
The E-30 is a more substantial camera to carry and maneuver than the others mentioned in this review, but we still found it easy enough to manage. And with the lens attached, the size advantage of the Micro Four Thirds GH1 is academic rather than practical at any rate. The E-30 grip is larger and more comfortable, though, and it doesn't have any buttons you might accidentally press, the way the movie recording button lures the thumb on the back of the GH1.
Controls
The two cameras have the same ISO range, but the Olympus does offer a faster 1/8000 shutter speed that can come in handy when shooting on brightly lit days. The Olympus measured burst rate of 4.63 shots per second is a big leap from the relatively pokey 3.16 from the GH1. And the E-30 offers some interesting fun features, including a set of Art Filter effects that produce dramatic results without technical skill and a slick multiple exposure capability.
| ISO Examples | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Panasonic GH1 | Olympus E-30 | |
| ISO 100 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Panasonic GH1 | Olympus E-30 | |
| ISO 200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Panasonic GH1 | Olympus E-30 | |
| ISO 400 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Panasonic GH1 | Olympus E-30 | |
| ISO 800 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Panasonic GH1 | Olympus E-30 | |
| ISO 1600 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Panasonic GH1 | Olympus E-30 | |
| ISO 3200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
NOTE: The images above are not used in our testing or scoring, but are included here to show real-world examples of the differences between cameras at the various ISO settings.
| Page 19 of 21 | Conclusion | ||
| Page 19 of 21 | Conclusion | ||