-
Introduction
-
01.Testing / Performance
-
02.Physical Tour
-
03.Components
-
04.Design / Layout
-
05.Modes
-
06.Control Options
-
07.Image Parameters
-
08.Connectivity / Extras
-
09.Overall Impressions
-
10.Conclusion
-
11.Specs
-
12.Sample Photos
-
13.Photo Gallery
-
14.Comments
Olympus Stylus 770SW
Previous:
IntroductionNext: Page 2
Physical Tour
Auto WB - Tungsten Illumination
Auto WB - Fluorescent Illumination
Auto WB - Shade Illumination
Color (5.22)
To test the colors of a digital camera, we photograph an industry standard color chart under optimal lighting and load the pictures to Imatest. The software analyzed the images, chose the one with the most accurate colors and output a few charts for comparison.
The following chart shows the chart’s original colors in the inner vertical rectangle, the Olympus Stylus 770SW’s recorded colors in the outer square of each tile, and the luminance corrected version of the ideal in the inner square.

To make this information easier to soak in, Imatest also output the next chart. It shows the ideal colors of the chart as squares and the Olympus 770SW’s colors as circles. Each color from the first chart is represented on the spectrum.

Colors are dancing around all over the chart with no clear winner as to which color is the most inaccurate. Blues are way off but so are the greens and yellows. The color itself is completely off, but the saturation appears to be nearly perfect at 100.5 percent. The mean color error came out to 11.5 and the overall score to 5.22. This awful score is the exact same score reported with the camera’s predecessor, the Olympus Stylus 720SW.
White Balance (4.44)
Auto (5.20)
The Olympus Stylus 770SW does not have manual white balance; it only supplies presets and automatic. It is likely that this automatic setting will be the most commonly used and judging from our test, that’s not a bad thing. The overall white balance accuracy on this digital camera is poor, but the presets are farther from where they should be. Cross your fingers, set the white balance to auto, and hope for the best.
Preset (3.68)
White balance accuracy certainly isn’t a strong point for the Olympus Stylus 770SW, and its presets showed that. The weakest presets include the tungsten and flash settings. Users are better off sticking with the automatic white balance setting.
![]() Tungsten WB - Tungsten Illumination |
![]() Fluorescent WB - Fluorescent Illumination |
![]() Shade WB - Shade Illumination |
![]() Flash WB - Flash Illumination |
Click on any of the thumbnails below to view the full resolution images.
|
Still Life Scene |
|
|
ISO 80 |
ISO 80 |
|
ISO 100 |
ISO 100 |
|
ISO 200 |
ISO 200 |
|
ISO 400 |
ISO 400 |
|
ISO 800 |
ISO 800 |
|
ISO 1600 |
ISO 1600 |
Resolution (7.69)
We tested the 8.1-megapixel resolution of the Stylus 770SW by photographing an industry standard resolution chart under optimal lighting and uploading the images to Imatest software. To be sure we got the absolute sharpest results, we photograph the chart at various focal lengths and apertures, and kept noise to a minimum by using the lowest ISO 80 setting. The image below was shot at f/4.3 and 16mm, achieved by bumping the exposure compensation down a third of a step.

Click to view high-resolution images
Horizontally, the Olympus 770SW resolved 1822 lw/ph using 2.6 percent over-sharpening. Vertically, the camera resolved 1638 lw/ph with 9.29 percent undersharpening. This is quite impressive for a compact digital camera.
Noise - Auto ISO (1.67)
Under bright lights, most digital cameras automatically select a low ISO to prevent noise from creeping into an image. The Olympus 770SW, however, automatically selected an ISO 200 setting which produced more noise than usual in this test. Thus, the 770SW achieved a low score of 1.67 which is worse than the 720SW’s 3.39.
Noise - Manual ISO (5.4)
The Stylus 770SW offers the same manual ISO choices as its predecessor, the Stylus 720SW. We measured the noise level in images using each ISO setting and came up with the following chart. The horizontal axis shows the ISO 80-1600 settings, and the vertical axis shows the percentage of the image speckled with noise.

On paper, the Olympus Stylus 770SW seems like it’d perform decently in low light. After all, it can be frozen and dropped and survive all kinds of other rough conditions. Plus, Olympus stocked it with a host of manual ISO settings and even a few scene modes, including one called Night. Sounds perfect, right? Read on.
We photographed the color chart in declining light levels of 60, 30, 15, and 5 lux. The first two tests are common shooting situations, such as a dimly lit restaurant. The last two tests are extremely dark and more useful for comparison and discovering any limitations on the image sensor.
|
Low Light Tests
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
60 Lux
|
30 Lux
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
15 Lux
|
5 Lux
|
A few problems arose when shooting the low light tests. In the Night and Fireworks modes, the ISO wouldn’t boost any further than 250 but could lengthen the exposure time to 4 seconds. Boosting the ISO to 400 in other modes shortened the shutter speed to a half-second. Despite all this, the images retained illumination but picked up more and more noise. The Olympus Stylus 770SW performed just slightly worse than its predecessor, with a score of 4.15.
Dynamic Range (6.2)
To see how well the camera could handle details in bright and dark areas of a single image, we photographed a Stouffer test target film that was lit from behind. It consists of a row of rectangles that range from transparent to light to dark to opaque and represents about 13 values of exposure, more than most digital cameras can handle anyway.
We load the images into Imatest which measures how many exposure steps the camera records that depict detail at two levels of quality. Low Quality measures steps of range with up to a full stop of noise, while the High Quality unit measures steps with a tenth of a stop of noise. We tested each ISO setting on the Olympus 770SW because dynamic range typically decreases as ISO sensitivity increases. The ISO is depicted on the horizontal axis of the chart below with the number of exposure stops recorded at the two quality levels on the vertical axis.

Speed/Timing
Startup to First Shot (7.7)
There isn’t much improvement in this area from the older 720 model. It took the older model 2.6 seconds to start up and snap its first shot. It takes the newer Olympus Stylus 770SW 2.3 seconds to take its first picture.
Shot-to-shot (9.1)
In the 770SW’s standard continuous burst mode, the camera snaps a shot every 0.9 seconds for only 4 pictures. This isn’t fast or long. And after those 4 shots, it takes another 5 seconds to process them and record them to the memory. There is a high-speed mode that shoots much faster, but this mode records low-quality images that won’t be suitable for large prints. The high-speed mode provides speed and longevity; it can snap 4 fps for up to 34 shots. The length of the burst wasn’t always consistent. Sometimes, the camera stopped after 23 shots, and other times, it stopped after 34 shots. After the approximately 10-second burst of images, it takes the camera about 4.5 seconds to process them.
Shutter-to-shot (8.8)
The auto focus system added some lag time as it took about 0.6 seconds to snap the image from start to finish. When the exposure was locked, however, it only took the camera a tenth of a second to take the picture.
Processing (7.5)
The Olympus 770SW snapped 4 shots in its continuous mode and then processed them in 5 seconds. It’s disappointing to see a camera take longer to memorize than to photograph; the camera took an average of 1.25 seconds to process each image.
Video Performance (1.79)
Bright Light - 3000 lux
Recording a video in the bright lights of the studio resulted in more accurate colors than the still images could manage. Still pictures had a mean color error of 11.5, but the video had a mean color error of 9.83. Colors were slightly undersaturated at 98.97 percent, and the average amount of noise hovered around 0.44 percent of the image.
![]() |
![]() |
Low Light - 30 lux
We dimmed the lights in the studio to 30 lux, which is a similar setting to a basement room with a single 40-watt bulb. Colors suffered as the mean color error increased to 17.6, and the saturation jumped to 109.3 percent. Noise leapt into the image as well – it covered 2.37 percent of the frame.
![]() |
![]() |
Resolution
We recorded a video of the resolution chart and analyzed it with Imatest software. The top video resolution of 640 x 480 pixels didn’t fare well. Horizontally, the Olympus Stylus 770SW resolved 179 lw/ph with 22.8 percent undersharpening. Vertically, the camera reads 332 lw/ph with 109.4 percent oversharpening. That’s not a typo: 109.4 percent. The video mode produces an incredible amount of sharpening that produced white artifacts around the borders of the resolution chart in the video. The camera was having trouble as there was a lot of clipping. The video wasn’t exposing properly; it seems that this camera does better in brightly lit situations than low light.
![]() |
![]() |
Outdoor Motion
After lackluster performance indoors, we took the Olympus Stylus 770SW outside and videoed a few cars going by and other moving subjects. The camera responded with poor exposure and contrast, and hazy areas of the frame that had less detail. The white balance seemed to change with the passing of the cars giving the movie a trippy effect. Add in abundant color moiré and the movie mode’s performance was very poor outdoors.
Shop for the Olympus Stylus 770SW
Latest News
& Reviews
-
10-Feb-2012
Sigma DP2 Merrill First Impressions Review
Sigma is back with a new high-end compact camera with a 46-megapixel Foveon X3 APS-C sensor. With image quality promised to be on the level of their $6000 SD1, can the new DP2 Merrill compete with the Fuji X100? Read More...
-
10-Feb-2012
Nikon Coolpix L810 First Impressions Review
Nikon’s L810 is a AA-powered ultrazoom that somehow manages 26x for under $300. Some cost-cutting efforts have certainly been made, and controls are quite simplified, but for the right user this could be an ideal camera. Read More...
Top Rated Point & Shoots
-

$459.991Panasonic Lumix FZ150
Excellent image quality, speedy performance, and a great design add up to the best superzoom that has ever graced our labs. That distinction seems to change hands every week, but trust us when we say that the FZ150 is a truly great camera. Read full 16-part review
$459.99TypesAny Zoom3,5.13.1x to 5x Zoom5.1,105.1x to 9.9x Zoom10,10x & Larger ZoomAny Megapixels0,8< 8 Megapixels8,108 to 10 Megapixels10,> 10 Megapixels -

$378.992Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
Canon's SX30 got a CMOS makeover that resulted in the SX40 HS, an impressive ultrazoom that captures beautiful shots in almost any scenario. Read full 16-part review
$378.99TypesAny Zoom3,5.13.1x to 5x Zoom5.1,105.1x to 9.9x Zoom10,10x & Larger ZoomAny Megapixels0,8< 8 Megapixels8,108 to 10 Megapixels10,> 10 Megapixels -

$427.953Sony Cyber-shot HX100V
This professionally-geared ultrazoom offers some of the best color accuracy we've ever seen. It's a shame the other scores weren't quite so strong. Read full 16-part review
$427.95TypesUltra-ZoomAny Zoom3,5.13.1x to 5x Zoom5.1,105.1x to 9.9x Zoom10,10x & Larger ZoomAny Megapixels0,8< 8 Megapixels8,108 to 10 Megapixels10,> 10 Megapixels16.8 MP -

$314.954Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47
Panasonic resists the urge to cram more megapixels and more focal length into their latest ultrazoom. The FZ47 instead focuses on image quality and features, resulting in an incredibly strong camera that we loved shooting with. Read full 16-part review
$314.95TypesAny Zoom3,5.13.1x to 5x Zoom5.1,105.1x to 9.9x Zoom10,10x & Larger ZoomAny Megapixels0,8< 8 Megapixels8,108 to 10 Megapixels10,> 10 Megapixels -

$417.005Canon PowerShot S100
Canon's PowerShot S100 improves on the popular S95 and takes its place at the top of the point-and-shoot food chain. Read full 16-part review
$417.00TypesAny Zoom3,5.13.1x to 5x Zoom5.1,105.1x to 9.9x Zoom10,10x & Larger ZoomAny Megapixels0,8< 8 Megapixels8,108 to 10 Megapixels10,> 10 Megapixels
Features
-
DigitalCameraInfo New Year's Giveaway
Check back every day for the rest of 2011 to see what we’re adding to the grand prize package. It all starts with the Sony NEX-5N and ends with over $4000 in prizes! Read More...
-
DigitalCameraInfo.com 2011 Select Awards
After a year of tireless testing and deliberation, we’ve made our selections for the very best cameras of 2011. Read More...


























(add your own)