| Latest Camera Reviews | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Recently Viewed Products | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Top DSLR Cameras | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $7500
Filters
|
|
|
| E-620 Prices |
|---|
| External Reviews |
|---|
Trusted Reviews Olympus E-620PC Advisor Olympus E-620 ReviewWired Olympus E-620Steve's Digicams Olympus E-620 ReviewDPReview Olympus E-620 |
| Pentax K2000 Comparison Summary | ||||
The Pentax K2000 is built for value, priced at $599.99 including lens and an external flash. We were impressed with how much you get for your money with this camera, including respectable lab-tested performance, solid construction and easy-to-manage controls. The Olympus E-620 is clearly a more advanced camera, with a host of options for tailoring the shooting experience to your personal preferences, a wide variety of bracketing options and Live View, which Pentax left out, along with a superior articulated LCD screen. When it comes to performance testing, though, the less expensive Pentax holds its own. The two cameras are neck and neck in resolution and, while the Olympus posted superior color accuracy scores, the Pentax and Olympus are neck and neck in resolution, while the Pentax is significantly better on dynamic range, white balance and image noise. |
||||
|
Canon Rebel XS Comparison | Page 14 of 17 | Nikon D90 Comparison | |
| Comparison Specifications | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Pentax K2000 | |
| Price | $799.99 w/14-42mm lens | $599.95 w/18-55mm lens and flash, $679.95 w/ 18-55 and 50-200mm lenses (in white) |
| Dimensions | 5.11 in/129.8mm (W) x 3.7 in/94.0mm x 2.36 in/59.9mm (D), 16.64 oz./472g | 4.8 x 3.6 x 2.7 in/122 x 91 x 67mm 18.5 oz/ 524g |
| Resolution | 12.3 megapixels | 10.2 megapixels |
| Processor | TruePic III+ Image Processor | PRIME image processing engine |
| Sensor size/type | 17.3mm x 13.0mm Live MOS | 23.5 x 15.7mm, Interline interlace CCD with primary color filter and integrated Shake/Dust Reduction sensor movement system |
| Kit Lens | 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 | 18-55mm; 50-200mm |
| Viewfinder | 95% field of view, 0.96x magnification | 96% field of view, 0.85x magnification |
| LCD | 230,000 pixel, 2.7 inch articulated LCD | 230,000 pixel, 2.7 inch |
| Live View | Manual focus Autofocus: High speed imager AF, Phase-difference detection AF, Face Detection |
No |
| Shutter Speed | 1/4000 to 60 sec, bulb up to 30 minutes | 1/4000 to 30 sec, bulb |
| Burst Speed | 1-4 frames per second | 3.5 frames per second |
| Autofocus | TTL phase-difference detection system, 7 points (11 points in Live View) | TTL phase-matching 5 point wide autofocus |
| Exposure Compensation |
±5 EV in 1/3, 1/2, 1 EV steps | ±2 EV in 1/3 or 1/2 steps |
| Noise Reduction | High ISO (three levels), Long Exposure | High ISO (three levels), Long Exposure |
| ISO range | ISO 100-3200 in 1/3 or 1 EV | ISO 100-3200 (1, 1/2, 1/3 steps) |
| Flash | Retractable flash, GN=17 @ISO200, (GN=12 @ISO 100.m) | Retractable P-TTL auto/manual popup flash |
| Media Format | JPEG, RAW | JPEG, RAW |
| Movie Mode | No | No |
| Media Type | CF (UDMA compatible), xD | SD, SDHC |
| Connections | Proprietary USB | Proprietary USB out, Video out |
| Other Hardware | No | AF200FG flash |
| Comparison Specifications | ||
| Olympus E-620 | Pentax K2000 | |
| Color | 17.86 | 12.86 |
| Long Exposure | 7.91 | 8.44 |
| White Balance | 5.94 | 13.83 |
| Noise | 5.36 | 6.50 |
| Resolution | 10.31 | 10.28 |
| Shot to Shot | 4.00 | 2.9 |
| Dynamic Range | 3.44 | 8.62 |
| Movie | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Performance
In our lab testing, the Olympus E-620 posted superior performance in color accuracy and burst mode shooting, and the two cameras were comparable in resolution, with good results. On all of our other tests, though, the inexpensive Pentax was the better choice, including far more accurate white balance and dynamic range. Neither camera is going to win awards for its handling of image noise but, even here, the Pentax scored significantly higher.
Components
The most notable missing link in the Pentax component rundown is Live View; the Olympus E-620 offers a reasonable implementation of the feature, the Pentax doesn't offer it at all. While both LCDs are the same size and resolution, the E-620 offers the articulated hinge and HyperCrystal technology that make it more flexible and easier to use in low light (though this is, of course, more important if you're using Live View). Both cameras are quite small and, while the Olympus appears more solidly built than the Pentax, we were impressed with the quality of the value-priced K2000 as well. One surprising feature in the $600 Pentax bundle is an external flash unit, which retails alone for about $100. Unfortunately, it doesn't offer bounce flash capability, which makes it a less valuable add-on.
Handling
The Pentax K2000 has a much simpler, less cluttered design, with fewer direct-access buttons. That can mean slower shooting, but both camera offer well-designed LCD-screen control systems that put key settings at your fingertips. As for the way the cameras feel in your hands, the Pentax has a deeper righthand grip, making it easier to hold steadily compared to the stubbier Olympus design.
Controls
The Olympus E-620 provides a greater range of customization options than the Pentax K2000, allowing the sophisticated shooter to tailor the camera to his or her personal preferences, though some of these options are buried deep in the complex menu system. The top ISO and shutter speeds are the same for the two cameras, though the Olympus offers significantly faster burst-rate shooting. And both cameras ladle on the flashy filter features, with the six Art Filters provided in the E-620 competing against the six Filter Effects of the K2000. We found the Art Filters more interesting to shoot, though the Pentax offers two options we wish Olympus would adopt: the flexibility of adding the filter effects after you shoot rather than in the original photo, and settings that let you adjust the intensity of the filter's manipulation.
| ISO Examples | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Pentax K2000 | |
| ISO 100 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Pentax K2000 | |
| ISO 200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Pentax K2000 | |
| ISO 400 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Pentax K2000 | |
| ISO 800 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Pentax K2000 | |
| ISO 1600 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Pentax K2000 | |
| ISO 3200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
NOTE: The images above are not used in our testing or scoring, but are included here to show real-world examples of the differences between cameras at the various ISO settings.
| Page 14 of 17 | Nikon D90 Comparison | ||