| Latest Camera Reviews | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Recently Viewed Products | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Top DSLR Cameras | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $7500
Filters
|
|
|
| E-620 Prices |
|---|
| External Reviews |
|---|
Trusted Reviews Olympus E-620PC Advisor Olympus E-620 ReviewWired Olympus E-620Steve's Digicams Olympus E-620 ReviewDPReview Olympus E-620 |
![]() |
Noise Summary | |||
• Image noise significantly higher than competitive cameras• High ISO noise reduction lowers noise significantly, but detail suffers noticeably • ISO settings range from 100 to 3200 |
||||
|
Color | Page 4 of 17 | Resolution | |
Noise (5.36)
It isn't easy to cram 12 million pixels into a Four Thirds-size sensor -- the individual light receptors have to be tiny and closely packed, leading to elevated noise levels, as shown in our lab testing. The Olympus E-620 tested at approximately the same noise level as the Olympus E-30, which is to say, poorly. particularly at high ISOs. Even a noise reduction system that does sharply reduce noise levels, as shown in the chart below, couldn't tame the problem, and as expected leads to noticeable loss of image detail. Overall the two trail the other cameras in our comparison group by a wide margin in this area.
We test image noise performance by shooting the X-Rite ColorChecker chart at each available ISO level under bright studio illumination (low-light performance is tested separately). When multiple noise reduction settings are available, we shoot at each of them, and the score is based on a camera's overall performance. Ordinarily we turn dynamic range enhancement features off for this test, since this digital manipulation can increase image noise, but Olympus doesn't offer "off" as an option. Instead, we shot at the normal setting for "gradation," the Olympus term for dynamic range enhancement. Click here for more on how we test noise.
Turning off noise reduction entirely to maximize image sharpness produced easily visible image noise by the time we reached ISO 400, and the problem accelerates rapidly from that point. The low noise reduction setting offers a major improvement at high ISO levels, but not enough to solve the problem. And while the two highest settings maintain sub-2% image noise across the board, the loss of image sharpness is readily apparent.
| Noise Reduction Level Comparison |
![]() |
The E-620 noise curves are all tightly clustered for red, green, blue, yellow and luma (gray) noise, with no single component color spiking (which can be highly visible).
| Color & Luma Noise |
![]() |
In the most demanding, noise reduction off testing, the two Olympus models produce photos with far more image noise than any of the comparison cameras, even at low ISOs.
| Noise Reduction Off Comparison |
![]() |
Crank up the noise reduction to its maximum setting for each and the playing field levels somewhat, with the Pentax K2000 actually noisier than the Olympus at ISOs up to 400, though the familiar ranking returns as we push to ISO 800 and beyond.
| Noise Reduction Maximum Comparison |
![]() |
The chart below shows the relative ranking of the five cameras in our image noise testing, with longer bars indicating superior performance and higher scores.
| Noise Score Comparison |
![]() |
ISO (5.50)
Available ISO values range from 100 to 3200. The ISO step value can be changed from the default 1 EV to 1/3 EV if you prefer finer increments.
In Auto ISO mode, both the default value to be used and the maximum allowable ISO can be set, from 200 to 3200 in 1/3 EV increments. ISO bracketing, a relatively unusual feature, is also available, providing a three-shot sequence with 0.3, 0.7 or 1 EV increments.
| ISO Examples | |||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | Pentax K2000 | Nikon D90 | |
| ISO 100 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | Pentax K2000 | Nikon D90 | |
| ISO 200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | Pentax K2000 | Nikon D90 | |
| ISO 400 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | Pentax K2000 | Nikon D90 | |
| ISO 800 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | Pentax K2000 | Nikon D90 | |
| ISO 1600 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | Pentax K2000 | Nikon D90 | |
| ISO 3200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| Olympus E-620 | Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | Pentax K2000 | Nikon D90 | |
| ISO 6400 | ![]() |
||||
![]() |
|||||
NOTE: The images above are not used in our testing or scoring, but are included here to show real-world examples of the differences between cameras at the various ISO settings.
| Page 4 of 17 | Resolution | ||