| Latest Camera Reviews | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Top DSLR Cameras | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $7400
Filters
|
|
|
| E-30 Prices |
|---|
| External Reviews |
|---|
DPReview Olympus E-30Lets Go Digital Olympus E-30 ReviewDigitalCameraReview.com Olympus E-30 ReviewPopPhoto Olympus E-30Photography Blog Olympus E-30 Review |
| Olympus E-30 versus Canon Rebel XS Comparison Summary | ||||
• The XS is less than half the price of the E-30, but generally offers better performance• The XS has much lower build quality and far fewer controls • Both aimed at new users, but the E-30 also includes many scene and art modes • While the Rebel XS may not have as many controls or modes, in terms of bang for your buck, it's impressive |
||||
![]() |
Canon 50D Comparison | Page 16 of 19 | Pentax K2000 Comparison | ![]() |
| Comparison Specifications | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | |
| Price | $1299.99 (body only) | $599.99 (with 18-55mm lens) |
| Dimensions | 5.6 in/141.5 mm (W) x 4.23 in/107.5mm (H) x 2.95 in/75 mm (D), 23.1 oz/655g | 4.96 x 3.8 x 2.4 in./126.1 x 97.5 x 61.9mm 15.9 oz./ 450g |
| Resolution | 12.3-megapixels | 10.1-megapixels |
| Processor | TruePic III+ Image Processor | DIGIC III |
| Sensor size/type | Four Thirds, 17.3 mm (H) x 13.0 mm (V) | 22.2mm x 14.8mm |
| Kit Lens | No | 18-55mm IS lens |
| Viewfinder | 98% field of view, 1.02x magnification | 95% field of view, 0.81x magnification |
| LCD | 230,000 pixel, 2.7 inch articulated LCD | 230,000 pixel, 2.5 inch LCD |
| Live View | Manual focus Autofocus: High speed imager AF, Phase-difference detection AF |
Manual focus Autofocus: (Quick mode, Live mode) |
| Shutter Speed | 60 - 1/8000 sec, bulb up to 30 minutes | 1/4000 sec. to 30 sec., bulb |
| Burst Speed | 1-5 frames per second | Approx 3 shots per second |
| Autofocus | TTL phase-difference detection system, 11 points | TTL secondary image-registration, phase detection, 7 points |
| Exposure Compensation |
±5 EV in 1/3, 1/2, 1 EV steps | ±3 stops in 1/3- or 1/2-stop increments |
| Noise Reduction | High ISO (three levels), Long Exposure | High ISO (one level), Long Exposure |
| ISO range | ISO 100-3200 in 1/3 or 1 EV | ISO 100-1600 in 1/3 or 1/2 EV |
| Flash | Retractable flash, GN=18 @ISO200, (GN=13 @ISO 100.m) | Retractable, auto pop-up flash |
| Media Format | JPEG, RAW | JPEG, RAW |
| Movie Mode | No | No |
| Media Type | CF (UDMA compatible), xD | SD, SDHC |
| Connections | Proprietary USB, DC in | USB, Video out, Remote |
| Other Hardware | No | No |
| Comparison Specifications | ||
| Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | |
| Color | 13.56 | 16.33 |
| Long Exposure | 7.93 | 12.37 |
| White Balance | 9.61 | 11.47 |
| Noise | 5.54 | 6.48 |
| Resolution | 13.03 | 9.21 |
| Shot to Shot | 4.63 | 3.02 |
| Dynamic Range | 5.49 | 8.42 |
| Movie | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Performance
When a $600 entry-level SLR outperforms one twice its price, you know that something is amiss. The Rebel performs much better in long exposure, white balance and startup time, though not as well in resolution or shot to shot bursts. There's a fairly decent chance that the stabilization on the E-30 is better, as it performed extremely well in that test, but we don't have IS data on the Rebel yet.
Components
The E-30 has a much higher quality of components than the Canon Rebel XS, which can feel a bit toy-like at times. It's light, made of low quality plastic, and has relatively fragile-feeling buttons. The XS has an inferior viewfinder, smaller LCD, doesn't have a secondary monochrome LCD on top, and has only the one control dial.
Handling
No question here, the E-30 handles much better than the Canon, with a wider array of buttons and a more comfortable weight. The extra heft makes for a more solid feel, as well as keeping camera shake down. It has a bigger grip, more robust material, and the controls are more directly accessible, rather than relying on the menu system.
Controls
The Olympus has a wider array of controls than the relatively simple Canon XS, which is very limited in what it can do, (though the functions the XS does provide, it handles quite well). The E-30 shoots faster, has a wider variety of exposure compensation, bracketing, white balance controls, ISO range, and just about everything else you can think of. But for all of that, when it comes down to the bare basics, the Rebel XS takes good photos at a much lower price than the E-30, and all the fancy Art Filters can be replicated in post-processing if need be.
| ISO Examples | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | |
| ISO 100 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | |
| ISO 200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | |
| ISO 400 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | |
| ISO 800 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | |
| ISO 1600 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Olympus E-30 | Canon Rebel XS | |
| ISO 3200 | ![]() |
Not Available
|
![]() |
||
This section of the review was updated with revised results and scores on July 15, 2009. These changes did not affect the relative ratings of the reviewed cameras.
| Page 15 of 18 | Pentax K2000 Comparison | ||