| Recently Viewed Products | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Top DSLR Cameras | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $7700
Filters
|
|
|
| D700 Prices |
|---|
| Latest Camera Reviews | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| External Reviews |
|---|
CNET - Cameras Nikon D700 Photography Blog Nikon D700 ReviewDCResource Nikon D700 Dev Hardware Nikon D700 |

The ideal color segment indicates the original color chart value,
the outer rectangle is the D700 result.

A second Imatest chart displays graphically just how close the captured values come to the original colors. In this case, the ideal color is represented by a square, the color as captured by the camera is shown in a circle, and the line between them indicates the distance between the two values: shorter lines equal better color accuracy.

Nice short lines in this chart indicate the D700 reproduced
color values accurately.

Assuming that a high number of megapixels in the camera spec equals the superior resolution performance in your actual photos is a rookie mistake. Optics, sensor quality, and image processing, among other factors, have a powerful influence on photo sharpness. In our testing, we shoot an industry-standard resolution chart at a variety of distances and camera settings, under bright studio lighting, to find the top resolution performance the camera is capable of delivering. Imatest software analyses the test shots and grades them based on the number of alternating horizontal and vertical lines the camera can clearly reproduce (represented as line widths per picture height, or lw/ph) before the chart figures turn into grey mush.

A full-resolution section of a D700 image from an industry-standard resolution chart
The D700 did well in resolution testing, topping out at 1787 lw/ph horizontal with 10.3 percent undersharpening and 1771 lw/ph vertical, with 12.4 percent undersharpening. This relatively high level of undersharpening found in Imatest’s analysis actually works in the photographer’s favor, since images have enough inherent data to respond well to sharpening tools (such as unsharp mask) during image editing.


The D700 did well in the dynamic range test, especially if you consider the extraordinary breadth of the ISOs being tested. Ordinarily dynamic range falls off as ISO increases, which means a camera that goes beyond typical 1600 or 3200 ISO values, and doesn't offer an official ISO 100 setting either, is at some disadvantage statistically. At the most typical ISO settings, though, the D700 turned in a fine performance. There is an anomaly in our testing results, though, as shown in the graph above. We expect noise reduction to cut down on dynamic range, since data is being removed from the image in an attempt to cut down on speckles and imperfections, a process that ordinarily blurs dynamic range steps as well. In this case, we found apparent improvement in dynamic range from about ISO 2000 on, and this improvement was consistent throughout the standard ISO range (the values actually came back to be nearly equal when we pushed beyond the official ISO range into Hi0.3, Hi0.7, Hi1 and Hi2. We have no scientific explanation for this unexpected results, and have contacted Nikon to ferret out what caused it. We will update this review when we have an appropriate answer.
As for dynamic range scoring, the Nikon ranked slightly below the other cameras here but, again, the lack of ISOs below 200 and the inclusion of those beyond 1600 should be factored in.
Nikon D700 Dynamic Range Scores

White Balance (6.29)
Sometimes looks are deceiving. Whether you look at a white sheet of paper in sunlight, or under a household lamp, or under fluorescent lighting, it looks like a white sheet of paper. That’s because the powerful meat computer between your ears skillfully adjusts for the very different colors of light these sources of illumination actually cast. Our digital cameras have to make a similar calculation to adjust for the color of light when taking photos, with greater or lesser success. And when white balance is significantly off, it’s not a subtle flaw you can easily overlook: just think of all those orange, overly warm shots you’ve seen over the years, taken indoors under incandescent bulbs with a camera that just couldn’t make light of the situation.
We test white balance under a variety of lighting conditions: flash, fluorescent, shaded daylight and tungsten. In each case we shoot the Gretag Macbeth color chart two ways: one using the camera’s automatic white balance system, the other by choosing the appropriate white balance preset. The D700 offers a variety of fluorescent presets, based on the many different types of fluorescent bulbs on the market. We shot with all the presets and went with the best results. Its also worth noting that, for each preset, the camera allows users to finely adjust the settings by moving a cursor across an on-screen color chart. If you take a shot and don’t like the results, it’s fast and easy to tweak the white balance settings and keep shooting until you get the look you’re after.
Our standardized white balance testing procedure calls for shooting in default mode, which in the case of the D700 led to lower-than-expected scores. The default color setting for the camera is Standard, which enhances colors subtly to provide a more visually appealing image. However, as shown in our Color test above, the Neutral setting favors accuracy, producing higher scores when Imatest analyzes the image. To achieve more realistic white balance results, setting the camera to Neutral is recommended.
The automatic white balance system did a good job while shooting with flash and under fluorescent lighting, but coped badly when asked to accurately capture colors under shaded daylight or tungsten lighting conditions.
|
Exaggerated White Balance Errors |
|
|
Auto WB - Fluorescent Illumination |
|
|
![]() Auto WB - Tungsten illumination |
Preset (5.67)
Here again, flash performance was excellent, and using the preset resulted in a major improvement when shooting under tungsten lighting. However, none of the multiple available presets outshone the results we found using the auto white balance setting when it came to fluorescent lighting.
|
Exaggerated White Balance Errors (Presets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's interesting that the Nikon D700 and the Canon EOS-1D Mark III show similar, relatively unimpressive scores compared to their less expensive cohorts. In both cases, the standard color modes aren't the ones that emphasize color accuracy, which throws off their scores on tests that stress precision rather than aesthetics.

| Page 3 of 15 | Noise Performance | ||