| Latest Camera Reviews | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Recently Viewed Products | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Top DSLR Cameras | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $7400
Filters
|
|
|
| D3x Prices |
|---|
| External Reviews |
|---|
Trusted Reviews Nikon D3xCamera Labs Nikon D3xePhotoZine Nikon D3xTech Radar Nikon D3xOutback Photo Nikon D3x Review |
| Sony A900 Comparison Summary | ||||
Sony's first foray into the world of full-frame SLRs didn't perform as well as other cameras at a similar level of price and sophistication. By no accounts was it a failure, but it didn't match the performance of competitive models in our lab testing. The A900 is one of the few cameras that the D3x out-performed more often than not. In the Sony's defense, it is significantly more user-friendly, with more automatic controls and a wider range of picture effects, and priced at $2699 compared to the $8000 Nikon. |
||||
![]() |
Canon 5D Mark II Comparison | Page 15 of 18 | Nikon D90 Comparison | ![]() |
| Comparison Specifications | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Nikon D3x | Sony A900 | |
| Price | $7999 (body only) | $2699 (body only) |
| Dimensions | 56.3 x 6.2 x 3.4 in./159.5 x 157 x 87.5mm 43 oz./ 1,220 |
6.25 x 3.25 x 4.63 in./156.3 x 81.9 x 116.9mm 30 oz./ 850g |
| Resolution | 24.5-megapixels | 24.6-megapixels |
| Processor | EXPEED | Dual BIONZ |
| Sensor size/type | 35.9 x 24.0mm (35mm Full-frame) CMOS | 35.9 mm x 24mm (35mm Full-frame) Exmor™ CMOS image sensor |
| Kit Lens | None | None |
| Viewfinder | Eye-level pentaprism, .07x magnification, 100% coverage | TTL, 0.74x magnification, 100% coverage |
| LCD | Super density, wide-viewing angle, 3 inch, 920,000 pixels | 3.0" TFT Xtra Fine™ (921k pixels) LCD |
| Live View | Tripod mode Handheld mode |
No |
| Shutter Speed | 1/8000 to 30 sec., bulb | 1/8000 to 30 sec., bulb |
| Burst Speed | Max. 5 shots/sec in FX format, max. 7 shots/sec in DX format | 5 fps max |
| Autofocus | Autofocus TTL phase detection, 51 focus points (15 cross-type sensors) | Dual-cross 9 point AF w/ 10 assist focus points |
| Exposure Compensation |
±5EV in increments of 1/3, 1/2, 1 EV | Manual: ±3 stops in 1/3- or 1/2-stop increments |
| Noise Reduction | High ISO (three levels), Long Exposure | High ISO (three level), Long Exposure |
| ISO range | ISO 100-1600 (in 1/3, 1/2 or 1-stop increments), expandable to ISO 50-6400 equivalent | ISO 100-6400 |
| Flash | External only | External only |
| Media Format | Compressed 12/14-bit NEF (RAW, Lossless compressed): approx. 60-80 percent Uncompressed 12/14-bit NEF (RAW) Compressed 12/14-bit NEF (RAW, Compressed): approx. 45-60 percent TIFF (RGB) JPEG: JPEG-baseline-compliant; can be selected from Size priority and Optimal Quality Uncompressed 12-bit NEF (RAW) |
JPEG, RAW, cRAW |
| Movie Mode | No | No |
| Media Type | CF, UDMA compatible | CF, Memory Stick Duo |
| Connections | NTSC, Hi-speed USB, 10-pin Terminal, HDMI, PAL | DC in, HDMI, Proprietary USB/video out |
| Other Hardware | No | Remote Commander wireless remote included |
| Comparison Specifications | ||
| Nikon D3x | Sony A900 | |
| Color | 13.51 | 11.00 |
| Long Exposure | 11.51 | 10.68 |
| White Balance | 10.68 | 10.53 |
| Noise | 6.51 | 6.68 |
| Resolution | 11.95 | 10.64 |
| Startup Time | 9.53 | 7.39 |
| Shot to Shot | 4.59 | 4.44 |
| Dynamic Range | 7.07 | 8.29 |
| Movie | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Performance
The A900 was the only comparison camera we looked at that scored lower in our lab tests than the D3x consistently, but even then we're not talking about a huge discrepancy. The major difference was in color and resolution, and the A900 managed to squeak ahead with dynamic range. The Sony also had a better automatic white balance performance, but the D3x was more accurate when manually set.
Components
In general, we preferred the hardware on the D3x compared to the A900. The A900's monochrome LCD provides less information than it's counterpart on the D3x, and we disliked the non-standard flash mount on the A900. The D3x also has the impressive 51-autofocus points, compared to the Sony's nine. In the A900's favor, the color LCD information display automatically rotates when the camera is held vertically, and the viewfinder has a useful sensor to turn off the LCD when hold the camera up to your eye. Both cameras have viewfinders that offer 100% field of view, which is a significant factor when framing a shot.
Handling
While both cameras are substantial, the D3x is the much larger and heavier of the two. Even given the size difference, we preferred the layout and handling of the D3x, as the buttons and grip on the A900 felt slightly awkward. Of course, for shooting in the field, we'd rather have the Sony strapped to our neck rather than the considerably more weighty Nikon.
Controls
The D3x has wider exposure compensation, more ISO choices and a much deeper set of controls over file quality. It also provides a wider variety of white balance presets, as well as better fine control over them, a larger range of exposure compensation, and more options for image quality, and setting focus areas across the 51-autofocus points. Where the Sony has a little victory is that is has more picture effects/color modes, which are useful to some shooters.
| ISO Examples | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Nikon D3x | Sony A900 | |
| ISO 50 | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
| Nikon D3x | Sony A900 | |
| ISO 100 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Nikon D3x | Sony A900 | |
| ISO 200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Nikon D3x | Sony A900 | |
| ISO 400 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Nikon D3x | Sony A900 | |
| ISO 800 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Nikon D3x | Sony A900 | |
| ISO 1600 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Nikon D3x | Sony A900 | |
| ISO 3200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Nikon D3x | Sony A900 | |
| ISO 6400 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Page 15 of 18 | Nikon D90 Comparison | ||