|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fuji Digital Cameras
Home > Digital Camera Reviews > Fuji Digital Cameras
Advertisement
Fujifilm FinePix S5200 Digital Camera Reviewby Patrick SingletonPublished on November 30, 2005
To better show the margin of error on these colors, Imatest also output a graph that plots the 24 original and the corresponding produced colors from the S5200. The graph is shown below with the squares representing the ideal colors from the GretagMacbeth chart and the circles representing the colors produced by the Fujifilm S5200. The line connecting the two shapes illustrates the degree of variance between the two; the longer the line, the more erroneous the particular color.
The Fujifilm FinePix S5200 received an impressive overall color score of 10.34. This is much improved from the camera’s outdated sibling, the FinePix S5100, which scored a 7.76 on the same test. The new S5200 also scored a low mean color error of 5.8, which is also much better than its S-series counterpart. When the digital camera was custom white balanced, the colors were muted and quite under-saturated at 94.83 percent. Surprisingly, these colors were not as accurate as the ones produced when the incandescent preset was used. This process was repeated multiple times, suggesting some deficiency in the camera’s custom white balance setting.
We found the Fuji S5200 to achieve its sharpest results at f/4.0 when shooting at a focal length of 18.9mm. Resolution results from this test are expressed as line widths per picture height (LW/PH). This unit is a count of how many alternating black and white lines of equal thickness the camera could theoretically read before it started blurring them together. Traditional measurements are expressed as line pairs per picture height (LP/PH), but since this unit does not account for various sizes of imaging sensors we use the LW/PH standard.
The Fujifilm FinePix S5200 received an overall resolution score of 4.01, which is quite respectable. The camera produced results comparable with digital cameras that advertise higher resolution counts. The S5200 read 1607 LW/PH vertically and 1639 LW/PH horizontally. This is right on par with the Kodak EasyShare P880, a SLR-shaped digital camera that advertises 8 megapixels. The Kodak produced scores of 1505 LW/PH vertically and 1627 LW/PH horizontally. (Keep in mind that resolution quality varies from manufacturer to manufacturer and even from model to model.) The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H1 advertises 5.1 effective megapixels – just like the Fuji S5200 – but reads 1835 LW/PH vertically and 1723 LW/PH horizontally. The Fuji S5200 will not be quite as sharp as the Sony, but still beats out the Canon PowerShot S2 IS. The PowerShot read 1373 LW/PH vertically and 1490 LW/PH horizontally. From all these figures, it appears that the Fujifilm FinePix S5200 performed well and ranks in the upper tier of 5-megapixel models in terms of sharpness and definition.
Once again, the Fuji S5200 vastly improved upon its predecessor. The older model scored a lackluster 4.05 overall score on this test and only offered a maximum sensitivity setting of ISO 800, while the S5200 extends up to ISO 1600 and handles noise much more effectively, earning a 6.32 overall manual ISO noise score. The chart shows a steady rise in the noise. ISO 64-800 settings on the Fuji S5200 have relatively low noise and outperform most similarly-styled models, while the ISO 1600 setting is a helpful inclusion for low light situations, but brings with it a sharp increase in noise.
The modified color charts above show decreasing saturation and diminishing color accuracy as light levels dim, which is normal of course. Many compact models produce terribly dark images at 5 lux, but the S5200 is still quite bright due to its long exposure capabilities and high sensitivities. While users will be able to attain exposures with ample illumination, the images will bring with it a hefty amount of noise. Below is a graph exhibiting the increasing noise levels as the exposures are prolonged. The horizontal axis shows the exposure time in seconds and the vertical axis displays corresponding noise levels.
There is a sharp rise in noise from the 0.167-second exposure utilized at 60 lux and the longer 0.2-second exposure needed at 30 lux. The noise levels look steadier from the half-second 5 lux exposure to the dimmest 1.3-second exposure indicating that the most dramatic increase in noise occurs at about 1/5 of a second. With the manual settings available on the S5200, users will be able to control illumination (exposure) and noise; however, even at ISO 800 in low light, color vibrancy and image clarity will be an issue.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© Copyright 2008 DigitalCameraInfo.com, all rights reserved. All trademarks and product names are property of their respective owners. DigitalCameraInfo.com makes no guarantees regarding any of the advice offered on this web site or by its staff or users. All user comments and postings are not the responsibility of DigitalCameraInfo.com. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||