Fuji FinePix F60fd Digital Camera Review

Fuji FinePix F60fd

Digital Camera Review

1.9 For a $299 camera, the Fujifilm FinePix F60fd has some intriguing features, including a 12-megapixel sensor, 3-inch LCD, a nicely constructed metal body and aperture- and shutter-priority shooting modes for enhanced exposure control. Lab testing turned up some significant problems, though, including higher-than-expected image noise and positively pokey performance on most speed tests. To see how advanced camera capabilities and real-world performance balance out, read the complete review.  
Advertisement
Recently Viewed Products
$250
$292
$159
$179
Top Point & Shoot Cameras
Max Price: $1020
$0 $255 $510 $765 $1020
Filters
All
Canon
Casio
Fuji
Kodak
Nikon
Olympus
Panasonic
Pentax
Sony
All
Compact
High-End
Pocket
Ultra-Zoom
1.Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1
Ultra-Zoom
$400
2.Canon SX1 IS
Ultra-Zoom
$527
3.Panasonic DMC-ZS3
Compact
$318
4.Samsung HZ15W
Ultra-Zoom
$280
5.Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Pocket
$325
FinePix F60fd Prices
Latest Camera Reviews
DSLR Point & Shoot
Panasonic
DMC-GF1
Samsung
TL225
Pentax
K10D
Canon
PowerShot S90
Olympus
E-P1
Canon
G11
Canon
EOS 5D
Panasonic
DMC-ZS3
Nikon
D3000
Canon
PowerShot A650 IS
External Reviews
CNET - Cameras
Fuji FinePix F60fd
DigitalCameraReview.com
Fuji FinePix F60fd

Testing results for the Fujfilm FinePix F60fd were a decidedly mixed bag. On the plus side, the camera scored well in our resolution tests and managed color reproduction well enough. Image noise and white balance, though,were distinctly disappointing, and rapid-fire photography is not an option if you want to use the full 12-megapixel camera resolution.

Color (8.15)

For better or worse, there is no scientific test for what makes a photograph's colors pretty. Take the shot of the Frank Gehry-designed Stata Center at M.I.T. which leads off our sample images for this review. The yellow tower and brick look about the way we saw them, but that rich, deep blue sky is basically a work of fiction on the part of the camera. It indisputably looks prettier than the real thing, which was much less saturated than what you see here. But it isn't delivering the memory color we expect, and in that way it's a disappointing photo. In our lab testing, we check for color accuracy, and reward it in our scoring system. We'd rather get an image of the real thing for starters and, if we want better-than-the-real-thing, fire up some photo editing software.
 

For testing purposes, we shoot the industry-standard Gretag Macbeth color chart under tightly controlled studio lighting, at each available ISO setting, and run the resulting images through the Imatest image analysis program to determine how accurately the known values from the chart are reproduced. Along with reams of statistical data, Imatest produces two particularly useful visual reference charts to display test results. In the image below, the color as captured by the camera is shown in the outer rectangle of each colored box. The narrow rectangle on the right is the color value of the GretagMacbeth chart. The larger inner region is the same color, adjusted to match the luminance of the camera's captured color.
 


This chart represents Imatest color results at the ISO 100 setting.


 

The second chart, shown below, provides a more schematic guide to what's happening with the color reproduction. In this rendition, the circles represent the colors as recorded by the camera, the squares are the ideal chart colors (the numbers identify the related square on the Gretag Macbeth chart). In this chart, shorter lines represent more accurate color rendition, while longer lines indicate greater liberties were taken.

As shown here, the colors representing skin tones, water, sky and foliage shift toward richer, more saturated hues. This doesn't garner the F60fd a tremendous score for color accuracy, but for a point-and-shoot camera, there are greater sins than making the world look a little nicer.
 


The F60fd favors color enhancement over accuracy.

We've chosen four additional compact cameras, with roughly similar specs and pricing, for comparison purposes. For color accuracy, the Fujifilm lags the field, though you'd be hard pressed to see the differences between the scores produced by the F60fd, the Nikon P5100 and the Samsung NV40 in actual photographs.

Fujifilm F60fd Color Scores


Resolution (11.52)
There's much more to image sharpness than mere megapixels. Several factors, including the image sensor itself, the camera optics and the image processing software inside the camera determine the quality of your final photograph. That's why we shoot an industry-standard resolution chart under bright studio lights and analyze the recorded images using Imatest to determine the true sharpness each camera can achieve.
 

The F60fd performed extremely well in this test. Resolution is measured in line widths per picture height (lw/ph), and this camera delivered a maximum of 2314 lw/ph measured horizontally and 2245 measured vertically, both high figures. According to Imatest, the internal software applied just the right amount of sharpening to the image. Too little sharpening and a digital image looks washed out, too much and you start seeing mathematically generated artifacts and imperfections.
 

The highest resolution scores were achieved with the lens set near its maximum wide angle setting, though the figures remain relatively consistent across the 3x zoom range.
 


A section of the chart that we use for testing, shown actual size

Compared to the other cameras in our test group, only the Samsung NV40 produced a better result, and the Fujifilm was markedly superior to the other contenders.
 

Fujifilm F60fd Resolution Scores


Dynamic Range (4.88)
You've undoubtedly seen the results of limited dynamic range, even if you didn't know the technical term to describe the phenomenon. You know the way a very bright area in a photo can be blown out, so all the detail disappears and you're left with a white blob? And in dark areas, when the detail you remember seeing fades away into murky, undifferentiated darkness? The ability to maintain detail in both the brightly and dimly lit sections of a photo is dynamic range and, while no camera can match the human eye in this regard, we can determine which cameras make a more or less impressive attempt through lab testing. In this case, we shoot a backlit chart with well-defined steps from pure white to pure black, at a range of ISO settings. The more distinct steps the camera captures (as determined through Imatest analysis of the final images), the better the dynamic range.
 

Dynamic range results for the F60fd are relatively poor, but within reason for a $299 compact camera, particularly when you consider that most shooting will be done in the ISO 100-400 range, and up to that point the camera's performance holds up pretty well. As shown below, the 4.88 score is run-of-the-mill, while the Samsung turned in a particularly strong result on this measure.
 

Fujifilm F60fd Dynamic Range Scores

White Balance (5.95)
White balance is a tough test for even pricey digital SLRs, and many an inexpensive compact reveals its true colors here by producing a host of untrue colors. The problem is that our brains do a particularly good job of adjusting for the different colors inherent in varying types of illumination: household tungsten bulbs throw off an orangish light, for example, while fluorescents tend toward greenish hues, but when you're reading your newspaper under either, the background strikes you as white, because your brain adjusts for the difference. To capture an accurate image, a camera similarly has to adjust to differing lighting conditions, but the digital brain is a poor substitute for the flesh-and-blood variety in this pursuit.

To test a camera's white balance capabilities we shoot our color chart under a variety of lighting conditions, generally including flash, tungsten, fluorescent and shaded sunlight. Nearly all digital cameras offer both an automatic white balance capability and the option to choose a labeled preset to match the lighting conditions. We compare the results produced using both settings. In the case of the F60fd, there is no preset for flash photography, so we've eliminated this category from our scoring.
 

Auto White Balance (3.91)
The automatic white balance capabilities of the F60fd are distinctly lacking across the board, with a particularly unfortunate performance in outdoor shade (which is certainly not an uncommon shooting scenario), and indoor tungsten bulbs didn't fare much better. Note that the color differences shown in these charts are exaggerated to show the kinds of shifts occurring: you won't see this level of difference in actual photographs taken with the F60fd.
 

   Exaggerated White Balance Errors


Auto WB - Flash Illumination
 

  
Auto WB - Fluorescent Illumination
 


Auto WB - Daylight illumination

 
Auto WB - Tungsten illumination
 


Preset (7.98)
Taking a few extra moments to set the camera's white balance system manually for the current lighting conditions pays off handsomely when shooting using either standard household incandescent or fluorescent bulbs with the F60fd, both of which moved from unacceptable automatic white balance performance to impressive results. The presets didn't help noticeably when it came to shooting in the shade, though.
 

 

  Exaggerated White Balance Errors (Presets)


Fluorescent Preset WB - Fluorescent Illumination 


  Cloudy Daylight preset WB - Daylight illumination


Tungsten preset WB - Tungsten illumination

White balance performance is a low point in the F60fd's overall performance, lagging the competition by a degree that would be clearly noticeable to the critical viewer.

 

Fujifilm F60fd White Balance Scores
 


 


 


Advertisement