-
Introduction
-
01.Product Tour
-
02.Color
-
03.Noise
-
04.Resolution
-
05.Video
-
06.Sample Photos
-
07.Playback
-
08.Hardware
-
09.Controls
-
10.Design & Handling
-
11.Canon SD970 IS Comparison
-
12.Casio EX-FC100 Comparison
-
13.Sony T900 Comparison
-
14.Conclusion
-
15.Photo Gallery
-
16.Comments
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR
Previous: Page 2
ColorNext: Page 4
ResolutionNoise
It has a good range of ISOs, and noise was low from ISO 800 down, but high ISOs make lots of noise, and the low noise EXR has limited uses.
Noise (9.62)
While shooting in standard 12-megapixel mode, the F200EXR has respectable noise levels up to ISO 800, but anything greater than that and the noise levels rapidly rise to unacceptable levels. Noise is a nasty static effect that significantly ramps up the higher the ISO setting. We shoot at two levels of studio illumination, one bright and one dim, at all full resolution ISOs, and analyze the noise levels using Imatest.
One of the tricks of the new sensor in the F200EXR is its ability is to combining pixels and shoot at six-megapixel resolution in an attempt to lower noise. This is done by putting the camera in EXR mode, and selecting SN Mode from the Menu, which offers high ISO and low noise. The sensor achieves this by combining the information from closely grouped pixels to create larger pseudo-pixels. While in this mode, the ISO maxes at 1600, where in other modes the maximum is 3200 (12MP), 6400 (6MP) and 12,800 (3MP).
We tested this mode against a few other shooting modes on the camera to try and get a feel if this potentially impressive new feature actually works. We shot our standard noise test at ISO 100, 400, 800 and 1600. We tested using 12-megapixel program mode, the EXR mode, 6-megapixel program mode, and we also ran the test on the 12-megapixel images resized to 6-megapixels using Photoshop.
Up to ISO 800, the advantage seems to lie in the standard 12-megapixel mode. However, above that the low-noise mode takes effect. What’s interesting is that shooting in 6-megapixels in Program Mode, and Low Noise EXR mode produce almost exactly the same results. According to Fujifilm, while in Program mode, the sensor is flexible, and based on the settings you have for dynamic range, image size and ISO, will use the EXR sensor mode. That being said, the difference between using the EXR mode and shooting at the full 12-megapixels is only 0.36% of noise, which isn’t a huge discrepancy. More on how we test noise.
We shoot this test under both bright light (3000 lux) and low light (60 lux) as some cameras tend to have worse noise under poor illumination. While there was a slight discrepancy at ISO 100, at levels above that there was almost no difference.
Compared to other cameras, the Fuji’s noise levels are very low at the ISO 100 to 800 range, but then rocket above every other camera after that. The table below shows the noise levels at four levels across the ISO range, for both 3000 and 60 lux.
| Noise Comparisons | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 80 | ISO 400 | ISO 800 | ISO 3200 | |
| 60 Lux | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| 3000 Lux | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
ISO (7.00)
At full resolution, the F200EXR runs from ISO100-3200, up to 6400 at six-megapixels, and to 12,800 at three-megapixels. The chart below shows 100% crops from all the comparison cameras, at each ISO, which show how they handle under the different conditions. You can see that the noise levels on the Fuji are acceptable up to ISO 800, but rapidly degrade after that. Some sort of noise reduction software seems to be used as well, which is why the ISO 6400 and 12,800 images look as if they’ve had a palette knife taken to them. The images below are all taken at full resolution, except the F200EXR’s IS) 6400 and 12,800, which are at six-megapixels and three-megapixels respectively.
| ISO Comparisons | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Canon PowerShot SD970 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| ISO Low | |||
|
ISO 80
![]() |
ISO 80
![]() |
ISO 100
![]() |
ISO 80
![]() |
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Canon PowerShot SD970 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| ISO 200 | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Canon PowerShot SD970 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| ISO 400 | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Canon PowerShot SD970 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| ISO 800 | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Canon PowerShot SD970 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| ISO 1600 | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Canon PowerShot SD970 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| ISO 3200 | |||
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Canon PowerShot SD970 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| ISO 6400 | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Canon PowerShot SD970 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| ISO 12800 | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Canon PowerShot SD970 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FC100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
NOTE: The images above are not used in our testing or scoring, but are included here to show real-world examples of the differences between cameras at the various ISO settings.
Shop for the Fujifilm F200EXR
Latest News
& Reviews
-
10-Feb-2012
Nikon Coolpix L810 First Impressions Review
Nikon’s L810 is a AA-powered ultrazoom that somehow manages 26x for under $300. Some cost-cutting efforts have certainly been made, and controls are quite simplified, but for the right user this could be an ideal camera. Read More...
-
10-Feb-2012
Canon PowerShot A810 First Impressions Review
Designed for absolute novice point-and-shooters, the $109 A810 holds up the bottom-end of the PowerShot lineup. Read More...
Top Rated Point & Shoots
-

$459.991Panasonic Lumix FZ150
Excellent image quality, speedy performance, and a great design add up to the best superzoom that has ever graced our labs. That distinction seems to change hands every week, but trust us when we say that the FZ150 is a truly great camera. Read full 16-part review
$459.99TypesAny Zoom3,5.13.1x to 5x Zoom5.1,105.1x to 9.9x Zoom10,10x & Larger ZoomAny Megapixels0,8< 8 Megapixels8,108 to 10 Megapixels10,> 10 Megapixels -

$378.892Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
Canon's SX30 got a CMOS makeover that resulted in the SX40 HS, an impressive ultrazoom that captures beautiful shots in almost any scenario. Read full 16-part review
$378.89TypesAny Zoom3,5.13.1x to 5x Zoom5.1,105.1x to 9.9x Zoom10,10x & Larger ZoomAny Megapixels0,8< 8 Megapixels8,108 to 10 Megapixels10,> 10 Megapixels -

$427.953Sony Cyber-shot HX100V
This professionally-geared ultrazoom offers some of the best color accuracy we've ever seen. It's a shame the other scores weren't quite so strong. Read full 16-part review
$427.95TypesUltra-ZoomAny Zoom3,5.13.1x to 5x Zoom5.1,105.1x to 9.9x Zoom10,10x & Larger ZoomAny Megapixels0,8< 8 Megapixels8,108 to 10 Megapixels10,> 10 Megapixels16.8 MP -

$314.954Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47
Panasonic resists the urge to cram more megapixels and more focal length into their latest ultrazoom. The FZ47 instead focuses on image quality and features, resulting in an incredibly strong camera that we loved shooting with. Read full 16-part review
$314.95TypesAny Zoom3,5.13.1x to 5x Zoom5.1,105.1x to 9.9x Zoom10,10x & Larger ZoomAny Megapixels0,8< 8 Megapixels8,108 to 10 Megapixels10,> 10 Megapixels -

$417.005Canon PowerShot S100
Canon's PowerShot S100 improves on the popular S95 and takes its place at the top of the point-and-shoot food chain. Read full 16-part review
$417.00TypesAny Zoom3,5.13.1x to 5x Zoom5.1,105.1x to 9.9x Zoom10,10x & Larger ZoomAny Megapixels0,8< 8 Megapixels8,108 to 10 Megapixels10,> 10 Megapixels
Features
-
DigitalCameraInfo New Year's Giveaway
Check back every day for the rest of 2011 to see what we’re adding to the grand prize package. It all starts with the Sony NEX-5N and ends with over $4000 in prizes! Read More...
-
DigitalCameraInfo.com 2011 Select Awards
After a year of tireless testing and deliberation, we’ve made our selections for the very best cameras of 2011. Read More...
































(add your own)