| Latest Camera Reviews | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Top Point & Shoot Cameras | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $2100
Filters
|
|
|
| Exilim EX-Z300 Prices |
|---|
| External Reviews |
|---|
Steve's Digicams Casio EX-Z300 |

The Z300's capture of the GretagMacbeth


The greens and purples are very close to their ideal value

Resolution (11.64)
Resolution is more than just a measure of megapixel count; it's the bottom-line sharpness in the images the camera produces, influenced by the sensor, optics, image processing and other factors. We photograph an industry-standard resolution chart, and feed the resulting images through Imatest, which measures resolution in terms of the number of line widths per pixel height (lw/ph). This represents the number of alternating black and white lines that can be discerned clearly before the image deteriorates into a gray mush.

A segment of the industry-standard resolution chart that we use for testing
The Z300 grabbed 2774 lw/ph horizontally and 2202 lw/ph vertically, without any appreciable under- or over-sharpening. As you can see in the comparison graph below, this is an excellent result, putting it above all the other models shown. This exceptional sharpness translates into more options for cropping and enlarging.


In the graph above, you can see how dynamic range falls as ISO increases. What is unusual is the sudden drop between ISO 64 and ISO 100. We expect there may be some odd digital processing at ISO 64 that artificially boosted the apparent dynamic range. Apart from that sudden plunge, it's a gentle and pleasant curve overall, and one that indicates almost no difference in noise levels between ISO 800 and ISO 3200, which is good for low light photography.

White Balance (6.21)
What our mind accounts for easily, but is trickier for a camera to deal with, is the way different sources of light can cast different hues. Light from incandescent bulbs tends toward orange, for example, but our minds adjust and we see it as white. We test how the camera deals with this by leaving it on auto white balance mode and shooting under a number of different light sources, and then shooting the same light sources using the camera’s presets. You can see the results in the illustrations below, though be aware that the color differences have been greatly exaggerated to reveal the color-shift trends.
The Z300 did excruciatingly poorly in the automatic section, except for one section, which pushed the camera's total score in this section up considerably. The one area where it achieved exceptional results was under indirect sunlight. Alas, under flash, daylight and tungsten light sources, it crashed and burned worse than a NASCAR driver with a hangover.
|
Exaggerated White Balance Errors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() Auto WB - Tungsten illumination |
|
Exaggerated White Balance Errors (Presets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even with two excellent results, the overall performance of the Z300 is decidedly sub-par, worse than any of the cameras we're comparing it to. So unless you're shooting in daylight, you may have trouble with odd hues in the images you use.

Page 3 of 15
Noise and Video