Casio Point and Shoot
Home > Digital Camera Reviews > Casio Digital Cameras > Casio Point and Shoot

Casio Exilim EX-FH20 Digital Camera Review

by Tim Barribeau
Published on November 10, 2008

Related Articles
Reviews: Casio EXILIM EX-F1 · Canon Digital Rebel XSi · Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18 · Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H7
News: Firmware Update 1.01 for the Casio EX-FH20 · Casio Exilim EX-FH20 Digital Camera First Impressions Review · Casio Exilim EX-FH20 Gets Official
Navigation

Casio made a large splash earlier this year with their Exilim EX-F1, boasting 1200 frames-per-second video and 60 frame per second photography at 6-megapixels, but with a high $1000 price tag. The EX-FH20 continues this tradition of high-speed/high-cost, but stepped down slightly to make it more approachable for those who don't have a spare grand in their back pockets. Arriving at the not insubstantial price of $600, the FH20 can record up to 40 fps at 7-megapixel resolution, or video at up to 1000 fps (which provides ultra-slow-motion playback), and has a 20x zoom. While the video mode seems a little gimmicky due to its focusing problems, need for exceedingly bright lighting and minimal resolution, the 40 fps mode is a boon for anyone trying to capture fast-action stills.

If you're a parent trying to get the perfect shot of your kid on the sports field, or a bird-watcher capturing an egret taking off, shooting at these high speeds lets you grab the perfect shot. Unfortunately, Casio seems to have put all their effort into these amazing speeds, and not enough into designing a good camera. The body feels low quality, and in our extensive lab tests it scored poorly in every section except white balance.

So, while the high speed videos are fun to play with, and the ability to capture images at a blisteringly fast pace is certainly handy when outdoors and in good lighting, unless you really need those features, the EX-FH20 is a dubious value.

 

Section
The Good
The Bad
Tour
Light and easy to handle
Body feels low quality
Testing/Performance
Good white balance score
Sub-par performance in every other test
Components
Competent zoom lens
Average quality LCD, no automated viewfinder switch
Design/Layout
Simple button layout, easy to handle
Poor quality buttons and dials
Modes
Incredibly high speed video and still photography
Limited editing controls, no true auto mode
Control Options
Some manual controls
Manual controls poorly implemented
Image Parameters
Ability to shoot RAW files
Inability to shoot burst mode at full resolution
Connectivity/Extras
Ability to use external power source
Eats through batteries
Value
Substantially cheaper than the F1, retains high speed
Still expensive for a poor overall performance
 


Reviews   |   About DCI   |   Staff   |   Advertising   |   Sitemap   |   Report an Error

© Copyright 2008 DigitalCameraInfo.com, all rights reserved. All trademarks and product names are property of their respective owners. DigitalCameraInfo.com makes no guarantees regarding any of the advice offered on this web site or by its staff or users. All user comments and postings are not the responsibility of DigitalCameraInfo.com.