- latest Reviews
- Nikon D300S Digital SLR
- Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7 Point and Shoot
- Casio Exilim EX-G1 Point and Shoot
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 Point and Shoot
- Pentax K-x Digital SLR
- Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 Point and Shoot
- Pentax Optio W80 Point and Shoot
- Canon EOS 7D Digital SLR
- Canon PowerShot D10 Point and Shoot
- Sony A550 Digital SLR
- More...
- reviews by Brand
- reviews byType
- digital camera Ratings
- reviews ofDSLR Video
- How We Test
- our Ethics
-
| Latest Camera Reviews | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Recently Viewed Products | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Top Point & Shoot Cameras | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $1050
Filters
|
|
|
| Exilim EX-F1 Prices |
|---|
| External Reviews |
|---|
CNET - Cameras Casio Exilim EX-F1Trusted Reviews Casio Exilim EX-F1ePhotoZine Casio EX-F1 Digital Camera ...Steve's Digicams Casio Exilim EX-F1 |
Value (7)
This is usually an easy section to assess, but this camera is so unprecedented that how much is worth is very much in the eye of the beholder. We got tired of the slow-mo movie feature quickly – you might find shooting Mentos hitting Diet Coke in exquisite detail endlessly fascinating. The standard-definition movie mode is better than some cameras we’ve tested, but nothing exceptional, and certainly doesn’t compare to what you’d shoot with a dedicated camcorder. As for the high-def movies, we like the look but hate the compatibility problems. That leaves us with the one feature we find irresistible: shooting lots of stills very, very quickly, a capability even our favorite SLRs simply can’t match. That’s why it’s going to hurt sending our review unit back to Casio, and why we’re giving the EX-F1 a high score in this category. At the same time, though, we’re inclined to wait till the next camera incorporating these technologies before dinging our own credit cards with a purchase.
Comparisons
Inevitably, trying to compare a unique multitasking device like the EX-F1 with existing products on the market is going to read a little like the old story of the blind men trying to describe an elephant when each is touching a very different part. Still, for the price of an EX-F1 you could buy a highly rated digital SLR and probably an extra lens to boot. And if it’s high-quality long-lens digital photography you’re after, plenty of solid cameras are available at a fraction of the price. With the unique characteristics of the EX-F1 as a given, let’s compare it against the strengths of four other cameras when it comes to tackling traditional photographic tasks.
Canon Rebel XSi – This low-cost digital SLR ($830 with the 35-70mm kit lens) outperforms the EX-F1 soundly when it comes to color accuracy, resolution, white balance, low-light performance and dynamic range (though interestingly enough, not in noise performance). The ability to use interchangeable lenses from a host of major manufacturers translates into a wealth of photographic possibilities, and manual controls are far more sophisticated than those provided by the Casio. Of course, the XSi has no video mode at all, a long-zoom lens is an extra-cost purchase, and burst mode tops out at 3.5 frames per second, which used to sound impressive.
Canon PowerShot S5 IS – With a list price of $499, the 8-megapixel S5 IS boasts a 12x-zoom lens with optical image stabilization, a very good movie mode and high scores for color reproduction and white balance accuracy (though image noise and dyamic range didn’t measure up in lab testing). Its 2.5-inch LCD folds out and rotates to provide additional comfort and flexibility while shooting. Burst mode is nothing to write home about, though, at 1.5 frames per second, and at nearly a pound, it lags behind other ultra-zooms in portability.
Olympus SP-560UZ – It weighs in at a svelte 12.9 ounces (versus 23 ounces plus for the EX-F1), even with an 18x zoom lens. With 8-megapixel resolution (versus 6MP for the EX-F1), the SP-560UZ lists for $499, and is widely discounted. The image stabilization system effectively combines optical and sensor-shift technologies, making it a superior performer for those handheld long-zoom shots. And when it comes to low-light photography, this Olympus model goes all the way to ISO 6400, albeit at reduced resolution. When it comes to our lab testing, the 560UZ was bested by several other ultra-zooms, but rarely by the EX-F1.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18 - The lowest-priced choice here, at $399 list, the FZ18 nevertheless provides an 18x optical zoom lens, RAW image capture, high-quality video capture and extensive manual control capabilities. The Panasonic shares the EX-F1s dislike for low-light autofocus, but proved far superior in reproducing colors accurately. And when it comes to portability it’s no contest: the Panasonic weighs in at 14.4 ounces with battery, and measures a modest 4.63 x 2.96 x 3.47 inches versus the Casio’s beefy 5.03 x 3.13 x 5.12 inch body.
Who It’s For
Point-and-Shooters – Yes, you can use the EX-F1 simply, and the fact that you can shoot large quantities of images first and figure out what came out well later can cover up a multitude of photographic technique shortcomings. On the other hand, this is a bulky piece of equipment to carry around, and much smaller cameras with even greater zoom lenses are available for far less money.
Budget Consumers – At $1000? Not a chance.
Gadget Freaks – It just doesn’t get much better than this. Amuse yourself with dials and controls and modes galore, enjoy the photo and video results and, most important, show off your Jetsons camera to all your friends.
Manual Control Freaks – It’s possible, but the manual control implementation is clumsy and limited.
Pros/ Serious Hobbyists – Six megapixels does not a pro camera make, and there are image quality and control limitations. Still, if you’ve got the extra cash, it’s hard not to buy a camera that will help you catch the one that got away as frequently as the EX-F1 will.
Page 10 of 13
Conclusion