| Recently Viewed Products | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Top Point & Shoot Cameras | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $1020
Filters
|
|
|
| PowerShot SX110 IS Prices |
|---|
| Latest Camera Reviews | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|

Greens and some blues were recorded very accurately


The SX110 IS struggled a little with cyan and magenta
but did very well otherwise.

Resolution (6.90)
There's more to resolution than just megapixels: it's the total camera system of sensor, optics, digital processing and so on that determines how sharp your final photo looks, not that highly touted megapixel statistic. We test for resolution by shooting an industry standard chart, and running the images through Imatest, which reveals the actual resolution in line widths per pixel height, a measure of alternating black and white lines across a single area.

A section of the industry-standard resolution chart that we use for testing
The PowerShot SX110 IS captured 1509 lw/ph horizontally with minor over-sharpening, and 1620 lw/ph with some under-sharpening vertically. While not an amazing score, it's about average for this type of camera (as you can see in the comparisons below); this mediocre performance seems to be the price of having such a large zoom ratio.


Apart from being a beautiful curve, the graph above shows how dynamic range steadily drops off as ISO sensitivity increases. Unfortunately, by the time you hit the higher ISOs, the SX110 IS really struggles to get a decent dynamic range. It's not a horrendous performance by the Canon, but it's a bit worse than the cameras we're comparing it to.

White Balance (5.85)
There are certain phenomena which are very easy for a human brain to deal with, but much more difficult for a computer chip to try and understand. One of these is the way different sources of light provide a different color cast over objects the objects they illuminate. Our brains can automatically compensate for this, and say "even though this sheet of paper is under an incandescent bulb, and looks slightly yellow, it's actually white." Cameras, on the other hand, have to try and deal with these color problems using a feature called white balance. We test how well they handle the challenge by photographing a color chart under a number of different light sources using both the camera's automatic adjustment setting and manual presets. In the examples below the differences have been exaggerated to make the color shift clear; you will not see this much of a discrepancy in real life.
With white balance set to automatic, we photographed with the flash, under fluorescent and tungsten bulbs, and in indirect daylight. The PowerShot SX110IS struggled with every setting, except the flash. All three other sources of illumination appeared to baffle the Canon, resulting in a poor score for this test.
|
Exaggerated White Balance Errors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() Auto WB - Tungsten illumination |
|
Exaggerated White Balance Errors (Presets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, the SX110IS did poorly with both presets and on automatic mode. Luckily, the camera does allow you to set a white balance manually, by shooting a neutral card under current lighting conditions, which might prove helpful if you are concerned about keeping your colors as close to real-life as possible.

Page 3 of 15
Noise and Video