or Browse:
Type
Brand
Price
Need
Browse By Brand Find a digital camera from your favorite brand
Browse by Price Choose a max price using the slider below
Max Price
Any

$150.00

Any Price
Advertisement

Canon PowerShot A520

First Impressions Review

Previous: Page 8

Connectivity / Extras

Next: Page 10

Conclusion

Value (7.5)
The PowerShot A520 competes in a crowded area of the digital camera market – an abundance of cameras are available for between $250 and $300, with many of them offering a variety of very strong automatic modes. The A520 is an attractive, small camera. Its particular advantages in this field are its 4x, rather than 3x, zoom, its excellent software, and its complete and easy-to-use manual controls in exposure and white balance. If you are seeking that level of control, the camera might be the strongest value available; however, if your preferences lean towards a competent movie mode, visible LCD screen, and internal memory, the A520 won't do you much good.

Comparisons

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S90 - The Sony DSC-S90 lists for $300, and sells for about $40 less online, just about the same price as the A520. Its significant advantage over the A520 is a 2.5-inch LCD. That’s much bigger than the A520’s 1.8-inch LCD, but size is the only advantage – they’re both 115,000 pixels. It may be easier to read the menus on the large Sony screen, but the display is not any sharper or more detailed. The S90's zoom has a 3x optical range, shorter than the A520’s 4x. The Canon zoom is better at both ends – it goes a bit wider than the Sony, and offers significantly more telephoto. The other significant difference between the two models lies in the type of shooting they are optimized for; the Sony offers far greater video recording capabilities, but does not have the manual controls available on the A520.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W5 - The Sony DSC-W5 lists for $350, well above the A520’s $300 list price. Its online price is also around $50 higher. The primary advantage to the Cyber-shot DSC-W5 is the added resolution - it’s a 5-megapixel camera, so its pictures ought to be a bit sharper when printed as an 8 x 10 or larger. The W5 has the same 2.5-inch, 115,000 pixel LCD as the S90 mentioned above, which again, will offer a bit more in the way of visibility, but certainly not clarity. Frame wise, the DSC-W5 and the A520 are essentially the same size, although the Sony W5 is almost an ounce heavier. This will offer far more in the way of durability, but does sacrifice something in the way of portability.

Nikon Coolpix 5900 - The 5900 has a suggested list price of $350, but is available online for as little as $270, just about what the A520 costs. The Nikon 5900 is a 5-megapixel camera, which should yield sharper enlargements. The 5900 has a 2-inch LCD, again with only 115,000 pixels. Like the Sony DSC-W5, the 5900 has a 3x zoom, rather than a 4x. The body of the 5900 is about the same size as the Canon A520, but it’s about two ounces lighter. The 5900’s video mode can record at 30 frames per second, which is far superior to the A520's movie mode.

Kodak DX7440 - For about $50 less than the A520, this Kodak entry level model offers the same resolution, the same zoom range, and a significantly better, 2.2-inch, 154,000-pixel LCD display. It comes with a lithium-ion rechargeable battery, which should last much longer and be much more convenient that the NiMH AA’s that the A520 needs (but doesn’t come with). The DX7440's ISO range tops out at 800, twice as high as the A520 and will enable it to functional in far less light. The DX7440 also includes 32MB of internal storage. Not only does the A520 lack internal memory altogether, but the DX7440's built-in storage is twice as much as the 16MB MMC card Canon included with the A520. The DX7440 also accepts SD/MMC cards. The DX7440 lacks a bit in terms of image control compared to the A520, offering just four settings for white balance, with no custom setting, but it does offer a manual exposure mode, as well as aperture- and shutter-priority modes.

Who It’s For
Point-and-Shooters - The A520 can take very good snapshots, and its controls are clear and uncluttered, enough so that most snapshooters would find it easy to use. There are an awful lot of features on this camera that point-and-shooters won’t use, so their dollars might be better spent on a camera that offers them unique features suited to their needs – built-in memory, more handholding from the menus or even smaller size.

Budget Consumers - Snapshooters on a budget could spend less and get less – a shorter zoom, limited white balance settings, and less manual control. On the other hand, users who want manual settings for everything probably won't find this level of control in any less expensive camera.

Gadget Freaks - Don’t you think most gadget freaks would love to operate their cameras from their computers? They already own the 45-foot USB cables. That feature simply calls to them. Throw in some accessory lenses and manual options and watch the Gadget freaks descend.

Manual Control Freaks - Manual control is without question the distinguishing characteristic of the A520. The A520 is capable of offering many control features inherent to DSLRs with the simplified interface of a compact model. While true control freaks probably are not too concerned with simplification, there might be a little freak in a lot of compact users that do not have the financial means to make the jump into the DSLR realm.

Pros/Serious Hobbyists -There are a fair number of serious photographers who like to carry a small, cheap camera everywhere they go, the way a writer might carry a notebook, or a painter a sketchbook. They want to be able to take a picture whenever they find an interesting subject, but they need a camera that they can control. The A520 could be that sort of camera.


Shop for the Canon PowerShot A520

Loading Recently Viewed Products
Advertisement

Latest News
& Reviews

Top Rated

Features

Shop for the Canon PowerShot A520

Advertisement
Canon PowerShot A520
First Impressions Review

Previous: Page 8

Connectivity / Extras

Previous: Page 10

Conclusion