Canon EOS 50D Digital Camera Review

Canon EOS 50D

Digital Camera Review

4.2 Canon's new EOS 50D is the incremental upgrade from their 40D which debuted last year. Renowned for being solid, dependable cameras with a wide variety of controls and access to a considerable back catalog of lenses, we put the Canon through a considerable variety of tests. On average, it scored well but not amazingly. Full details follow. The 50D is currently available for $1399 (body only).
Advertisement
Top DSLR Cameras
Max Price: $7700
$0 $1925 $3850 $5775 $7700
Filters
All
Canon
Fuji
Nikon
Olympus
Panasonic
Pentax
All
Consumer
Professional
Prosumer
1.Olympus E-P1
Consumer
$800
2.Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Prosumer
$2,680
3.Nikon D5000
Consumer
$719
4.Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Consumer
$795
5.Panasonic DMC-GF1
Consumer
$900
EOS 50D Prices
Latest Camera Reviews
DSLR Point & Shoot
Panasonic
DMC-GF1
Samsung
TL225
Pentax
K10D
Canon
PowerShot S90
Olympus
E-P1
Canon
G11
Canon
EOS 5D
Panasonic
DMC-ZS3
Nikon
D3000
Canon
PowerShot A650 IS
External Reviews
CNET - Cameras
Canon EOS 50D
Photography Review
Canon EOS 50D Review
DCResource
Canon EOS 50D

Overall, through our extensive gamut of testing, the 50D performed well, but not exceptionally well. In general it scored slightly worse than it's predecessor, the 40D, but about on par with the Nikon D90. It is surprising that the Canon Rebel XSi, a much much more affordable camera, consistently scored as well as, if not better than, the 50D.

Color (8.67)

To test the camera's ability accurately record color, we photograph the Gretag Macbeth color chart, which is composed of carefully defined and consistently reproduced colors. This photo is then run through the image analysis application Imatest, which can judge how much the captured image differes from the true chart color. Keep in mind, this test is to see how accurate the colors are, and will penalize cameras that make them overly bright or saturated. While having extreme colors may make for exciting pictures, they actually lose information for editing, and aren't as close to reality. The chart is photographed at every available ISO under bright 1700-lux illumination.

Canon has a series of what are known as Picture Styles, which alter the color, brightness, sharpness and saturation of an image. After extensive testing, we found that the Faithful setting provided the best results, and so tested on this setting.

The chart below shows how close the captured color (the outer rectangle) is to the luminance-corrected true color (inner square) and the original chart color (inset rectangle).


The analyzed Gretag Macbeth color chart


The graph below expresses the same information, but in a slightly more readable manner. The ideal color is represented by the square, the actual color is in the circle, and the hue and saturation error is shown by the distance and direction of the line. So the longer the line, the less accurate the color.


The 50D did very well reproducing blues and pinks

The Canon scored slightly below average on this test, especially disappointing when compared the significantly better scores of the Rebel XSi, which costs less than half the price of the 50D. Some of this may be due to the under-saturated nature of shooting in Faithful mode, which is arguably a design advantage rather than a flaw. In post-processing, it's relatively easy to add saturation to an image, and retain quality. Whereas, if you start with an over-saturated image, trying to lower the saturation level is difficult to do without ending up with a drab picture. Canon may have decided to deliberately under-saturate the colors in this camera to allow photographers more post-processing control.

Canon EOS-50D Color Scores


Regardless of this fact, we were still hoping for a slightly better score out of the 50D, as Canon cameras have a reputation for good color accuracy.

Resolution (11.59)
Our resolution test is more than just a measure of megapixels. Rather, we look at how adept the camera is at recording fine details. A high resolution score means that your camera can capture a large amount of information, without undersharpening or oversharpening the picture. We photograph a standardized resolution chart, evenly lit to 1700 lux, from a number of distances, and at every available aperture. The resulting pictures are analyzed through Imatest, which outputs a measure of resolution as line widths per pixel height (lw/ph), which is a count of the maximum number of distinct alternating black and white lines.


An actual-size section of the industry-standard resolution chart shot with the 50D

At its best, the 50D captured 1938 lw/ph horizontally with approximately 7% undersharpening and 2004 lw/ph vertically with 9.3% undersharpening. This produced a good score for the camera, which would have been even better if not for the noticeable undersharpening. Once again, this is probably a conscious decision from Canon, as it's far easier to sharpen an undersharpened image than it is to unsharpen one that's oversharpened (try saying that five times fast!). This puts more control in the hand of the photographer, rather than trying to get the prettiest looking picture directly from the camera.

Canon EOS-50D Resolution Scores


 
Dynamic Range (8.67)
The dynamic range of a camera measures how well it captures scenes that involve a large amount of both dark and light areas, without causing them to be over- or under-exposed, respectively. If, perchance, you happened to be photographing a zeal of zebra, you would want their black stripes to look black as ebony, and their white stripes to be white as snow. A camera with a good dynamic range will be able to do that, where a camera with a poor dynamic range will veer toward gray. To test this, we use a backlit Stouffer chart, which has a series of tabs running from white to black through steps of gray. We shoot this chart at every available ISO, and with all types of High ISO noise reduction. The resulting image is run through Imatest, which analyzes the number of distinct levels between black and white.

As you can see from the above graph, the dynamic range starts to fall as the ISO increases. This is due to the increased light sensitivity of higher ISOs, which have a tendency to turn the blacks into grays. You can also see that the higher the noise reduction level, the better the apparent dynamic range, especially above about ISO 800. Once again, we saw the 50D performing below what we would expect, taking a performance hit over both the preceding 40D, the markedly cheaper XSi, and the competition's D300. It was by no means a bad score, but it just doesn't hold up compared to some other models.

Canon EOS-50D Dynamic Range Scores


White Balance (9.36)
A camera's white balance system accommodates the different color temperatures provided by different light sources. For instance, a tungsten light will produce a noticeably more orange hue than natural sunlight, and a fluorescenct bulb will be a bit bluer. Our brains can easily account for this, and make a white object seem white, regardless of the light cast. A camera, contrarily, has to digitally adjust to deal with this difference between how things actually look, and how we want them to. We tested the 50D's white balancing abilities in two ways, first using the automatic white balance setting under flash, fluorescent, indirect daylight and tungsten lights. We then also tested the presets for each of those light sources, which are the 50D's built in settings for each source, and ran the resulting images through Imatest to test for color accuracy. Keep in mind, the charts below are highly exaggerated: you won't see this level of error in your actual photographs.

Auto White Balance(12.15)
The automatic white balance performed very well for two of the illumination sources, and less so for the other two. The flash and fluorescent results were both exemplary, and showed a result that was very close to reality. For daylight illumination, it was below average, but not abysmal. The 50D really struggled with tungsten illumination, though, a common problem, but unfortunate as tungsten lights are used for most indoor lighting situations.

   Exaggerated White Balance Errors


Auto WB - Flash Illumination
 

  

Auto WB - Fluorescent Illumination 


Auto WB - Cloudy Daylight illumination

 
Auto WB - Tungsten illumination
 

Preset (6.58)
The preset white balance settings fared a little worse for flash and shade; significantly better for the tungsten, and much, much worse for fluorescent. This is most likely due to the fact that fluorescent lights can actually represent quite a wide variety of color temperatures, which is why many camera have two or three fluorescent settings. The 50D, unfortunately, only has one, and so did not fare well in this phase of the testing. Once again, remember, the errors shown below are exaggerated, and far beyond what you would actually see.

   Exaggerated White Balance Errors (Presets)


Flash Preset WB - Flash Illumination
 


Fluorescent Preset WB - Fluorescent Illumination 


  Cloudy Daylight preset WB - Daylight illumination


Tungsten preset WB - Tungsten illumination

The 50D scored above average on this test, mostly on the strength of it's automatic setting. Based on the result we've seen in this test, unless you're shooting under tungsten, you'll do just fine using the automatic setting. Even beyond the automatic and presets, the 50D also has the option to manually white balance from a stored image white or grey image, enter the Kelvin value of a specific lighting setup, as well as amber/blue and green/magenta shifting for fine tuning. With this bevy of settings, you should be able to setup the correct white balance for nigh on any situations, assuming you have the time to select the proper options.


Canon EOS-50D White Balance Scores

 

Advertisement