| Top DSLR Cameras | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Price: $7700
Filters
|
|
|
| EOS 50D Prices |
|---|
| Latest Camera Reviews | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| External Reviews |
|---|
CNET - Cameras Canon EOS 50D Photography Review Canon EOS 50D ReviewDev Hardware Canon EOS 50D ReviewDPInterface Canon EOS 50D ReviewDCResource Canon EOS 50D |
The chart below shows how close the captured color (the outer rectangle) is to the luminance-corrected true color (inner square) and the original chart color (inset rectangle).

The analyzed Gretag Macbeth color chart


The 50D did very well reproducing blues and pinks

Regardless of this fact, we were still hoping for a slightly better score out of the 50D, as Canon cameras have a reputation for good color accuracy.
Resolution (11.59)
Our resolution test is more than just a measure of megapixels. Rather, we look at how adept the camera is at recording fine details. A high resolution score means that your camera can capture a large amount of information, without undersharpening or oversharpening the picture. We photograph a standardized resolution chart, evenly lit to 1700 lux, from a number of distances, and at every available aperture. The resulting pictures are analyzed through Imatest, which outputs a measure of resolution as line widths per pixel height (lw/ph), which is a count of the maximum number of distinct alternating black and white lines.

An actual-size section of the industry-standard resolution chart shot with the 50D
At its best, the 50D captured 1938 lw/ph horizontally with approximately 7% undersharpening and 2004 lw/ph vertically with 9.3% undersharpening. This produced a good score for the camera, which would have been even better if not for the noticeable undersharpening. Once again, this is probably a conscious decision from Canon, as it's far easier to sharpen an undersharpened image than it is to unsharpen one that's oversharpened (try saying that five times fast!). This puts more control in the hand of the photographer, rather than trying to get the prettiest looking picture directly from the camera.


As you can see from the above graph, the dynamic range starts to fall as the ISO increases. This is due to the increased light sensitivity of higher ISOs, which have a tendency to turn the blacks into grays. You can also see that the higher the noise reduction level, the better the apparent dynamic range, especially above about ISO 800. Once again, we saw the 50D performing below what we would expect, taking a performance hit over both the preceding 40D, the markedly cheaper XSi, and the competition's D300. It was by no means a bad score, but it just doesn't hold up compared to some other models.

White Balance (9.36)
A camera's white balance system accommodates the different color temperatures provided by different light sources. For instance, a tungsten light will produce a noticeably more orange hue than natural sunlight, and a fluorescenct bulb will be a bit bluer. Our brains can easily account for this, and make a white object seem white, regardless of the light cast. A camera, contrarily, has to digitally adjust to deal with this difference between how things actually look, and how we want them to. We tested the 50D's white balancing abilities in two ways, first using the automatic white balance setting under flash, fluorescent, indirect daylight and tungsten lights. We then also tested the presets for each of those light sources, which are the 50D's built in settings for each source, and ran the resulting images through Imatest to test for color accuracy. Keep in mind, the charts below are highly exaggerated: you won't see this level of error in your actual photographs.
The automatic white balance performed very well for two of the illumination sources, and less so for the other two. The flash and fluorescent results were both exemplary, and showed a result that was very close to reality. For daylight illumination, it was below average, but not abysmal. The 50D really struggled with tungsten illumination, though, a common problem, but unfortunate as tungsten lights are used for most indoor lighting situations.
|
Exaggerated White Balance Errors |
|
|
Auto WB - Fluorescent Illumination |
|
|
![]() Auto WB - Tungsten illumination |
|
Exaggerated White Balance Errors (Presets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 50D scored above average on this test, mostly on the strength of it's automatic setting. Based on the result we've seen in this test, unless you're shooting under tungsten, you'll do just fine using the automatic setting. Even beyond the automatic and presets, the 50D also has the option to manually white balance from a stored image white or grey image, enter the Kelvin value of a specific lighting setup, as well as amber/blue and green/magenta shifting for fine tuning. With this bevy of settings, you should be able to setup the correct white balance for nigh on any situations, assuming you have the time to select the proper options.

Page 3 of 15
Noise and Video