Home > Digital Camera Reviews > Canon Digital Cameras

Canon EOS Rebel XS

Digital Camera Review

Sep 04, 2008 - By Tim Barribeau

Latest Camera Reviews
DSLR Point & Shoot Samsung NX10 Panasonic DMC-TS2 Olympus E-P1 Casio EX-G1 Nikon D300S Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 Pentax K-X Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 Nikon D3000 Samsung TL500

Recently Viewed Products
Nikon Coolpix S630 $197

Top DSLR Cameras
Max Price: $7500 $0 $1875 $3750 $5625 $7500 Filters All Canon Fuji Nikon Olympus Panasonic Pentax All Consumer Professional Prosumer 1. Canon EOS 7D Prosumer $1,499 2. Nikon D300S Prosumer $1,469 3. Olympus E-P1 Consumer $648 5. Nikon D5000 Consumer $649 6. Canon EOS Rebel T1i Consumer $678

EOS Rebel XS Prices

External Reviews
DPReview Canon EOS 1000D (Rebel XS /... ePhotoZine Canon EOS 1000D Digital SLR... Dev Hardware Canon EOS Rebel XS LaptopMag Canon EOS Rebel XS Review PC World Canon EOS Rebel XS Review More

Size / Portability (7.75)
The XS is 5.8 inches wide, 3.8 inches high and 2.4 inches deep (126.1 x 97.5 x 61.9 mm) without a lens. The body weighs 15.9 oz  (450 grams), ever so slightly less than the XSi. As with all SLRs, this is not a camera you can casually throw in a purse or pocket. However, it is on the small side for its class, and has a lightweight body, which makes it slightly easier to lug around.

Handling Ability (5.50)
The Rebel XS has a petite grip for an SLR, lending itself to those with smaller hands. However, because it’s so light, it doesn’t require as much pressure to hold securely as some other cameras, so the grip is large enough.  The shift from rubber to textured plastic is saddening, as the plastic doesn’t offer nearly as firm a handhold. One new addition is a strip of textured plastic along the left side of the camera. This seems to be designed to help hold the camera when using the Live View mode.

The XS grip is more suited to those with small hands

Control Button / Dial Positioning / Size (7.25)
In contrast to some other brands, such as Nikon, the XS primarily uses a system whereby each major function used in shooting is assigned to a unique button, rather than navigating an on-screen menu. This equates to a button for ISO, AF point, exposure compensation, white balance, shooting mode, metering, auto focus mode, picture style, playback, delete, menu and display options. Pressing these bring up the appropriate sub-menus, which are navigated with the four-way pad and the Set button. While this leads to a slightly more cluttered body than some of the competition, it also allows for fewer button presses to control each setting.

Canon’s entry-level SLRs put their single control dial just behind the shutter trigger, so you use your pointer finger to change aperture, shutter and exposure settings. This can take a bit of getting used to if you’re used to Nikon and Olympus’ method of putting the control dial by your thumb, but it is entirely up to personal preference whether one position is better than the other. The control dial on this model suffers from the same problem as some of the other Canons, namely it feels flimsy .

The mode dial turns quite easily, but not so easily as to make choosing the correct setting difficult. The dial does not rotate a full 360°, instead only turning  three quarters of the way around. The disadvantage to this system  is that, if you’re at one end of the mode dial, you have to shift all the way back to get to other end, whereas Nikon’s preferred method allows you to rotate in a full circle. The advantage lies in being able to identify your position on the dial by touch alone, as you know your absolute position on the continuum of settings.

Controls are clearly marked and easy to use.