|
|

02-23-2006, 05:47 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 64
|
|
Canon's auto stitch vs. others
Well, I installed Canon's software with much resitation. I am not a big fan of the software that these devices usually come with. I find it too dumbified. To my surprise, the Canon software is quite neat. Very classy interface and organized. I specially liked the auto-stich feature. Did a pretty devent job of creating panoramas from stills I took. However, when taking vertical shots, it begins to mess up. Anyone know if Photoshop, Paintshop Pro, or other third-party software will do a better job with panoramas?
Thanks in advance...
|

02-24-2006, 04:30 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 176
|
|
Re: Canon's auto stitch vs. others
I too have never been much for "automatic" features nor "all-in-one" video/photo "solution suites". Sometimes there are individual features that work great, but too often I feel like I am being forced into "think our way, and work with our program like this, or do nothing".
So, this is a highly individualistic thing! But I will keep your report in mind and if I get a chance to try Canon's auto-stitch, I will.
|

03-05-2006, 05:30 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 64
|
|
Re: Canon's auto stitch vs. others
Well, after playing with it for a while, I have discovered something good and bad. I learned that the auto-stick feature does indeed allow for multiple images to keep being stacked, both horizontally and vertically. However, it doesn't "stich" the image together within the camera. It requires a software to accomplish that. It basically only keeps the last image you shot on the screen with a space to the left/right, top/bottom so that you can accurately align the next shot. I know that a lot of programs nowadays do photo stiching with ease, but I was hoping that the camcorder would do this within.
Oh well...
|

03-05-2006, 11:21 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 176
|
|
Re: Canon's auto stitch vs. others
Well, that's a major help in the camera though to have the "edge to line up" of the previous picture displayed to you. Should help lessen needing to "waste" (as if that's possible with digital photos on erasable memory) by having lots of overlap.
|

03-07-2006, 06:23 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 64
|
|
Re: Canon's auto stitch vs. others
Definetely does help, but it would be nice to have it automatically stich the images together for you. That way I can export it to my friend's computer already in panoramic format.
|

06-09-2006, 01:07 AM
|
|
Slightly Mental Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Honolulu, Hawai'i - a Brit abroad
Posts: 253
|
|
Re: Canon's auto stitch vs. others
Don't bother with Canon's stitching software. It's pretty limited in what it can accomplish, and you're more or less required to shoot in the camera's "stitch assist" mode.
I don't know if things have improved since my S230, but its "stitch assist" is awful - it denies you the ability to lock focus and exposure, limits the order in which you can shoot, and is actually kinda distracting on such a small screen.
Try this:
www.autostitch.net
This is a freebie for Windows that can do amazing things with a big set of photos for a panoramic shot. It doesn't need anything special from the camera - just a big pile of photos.
You'll get the best results out of it (and probably most of these apps) if you take lots of photos with plenty of overlap. Take the number of photos you think you'd need, and then double or triple it. IGo nuts with the overlap - 50% overlap between shots is a decent target and will give the app plenty of info to match things up with.
|

01-18-2007, 07:55 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
|
|
Re: Canon's auto stitch vs. others
I just did some vertical stitching on scans of 50 year old , oversize wedding album pics. Only two pics, but very flat.
I added contrast and cropped the lower half picture, to an area that had a fair amount of detail( through the middle of a hand and fingers, and am unable to find the stitching. It's great. Tried two other stitch programs first, without success, but Canon's did it just fine.
|

01-21-2007, 09:46 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
|
|
Re: Canon's auto stitch vs. others
autostitch does do a great job on any number of Horizontals, even layers of them. I found no way to do pure verticals, though. And have the latest version.
|

02-15-2007, 04:58 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
|
|
Re: Canon's auto stitch vs. others
Last edited by Smeghead : 02-16-2007 at 07:21 AM.
Reason: Spammy link in sig disabled. Another one of those and a ban will be in order, mmm'kay?
|

02-19-2008, 02:56 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 19
|
|
Re: Canon's auto stitch vs. others
That is a long time. I did not realize it took that long.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:32 PM.
|